User talk:DataNomad

Displacement of Arabs in Kirkuk under KRG administration moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Displacement of Arabs in Kirkuk under KRG administration. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Pbritti (talk) 11:31, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How? There was only one small source about a statement that was a dead link which could have been fixed easily by removing it or replacing it with another one and same with grammar if there is any small issues that can be fixed too. Other than that i dont see the problem especially for this page which didnt use Ai (chatbots etc) or else it would have been way longer Kuripenjwen (talk) 11:52, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The other ones you removed is fine but this one had only one simple little mistake, which doesnt affect the whole article Kuripenjwen (talk) 11:56, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond several typos and significant errors of fact, the way separate events were discussed events looked like the kind of original research evident in LLM-made articles. However, the article could be re-written about the 2016 expulsions if sufficient sources were found. I think that could be accomplished. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DataNomad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand what a 'proxy' is. I don't use any VPNs or similar tools. If this its about that, what proof is there that I did something wrong to get IP banned for 5 months? I follow all the rules and don’t use VPNs, location changers, or anything like that, NO i do not use this for anything bad i want to continue making articles as it recently became my new hobby. This is literally random unfair ban

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using Wikipedia:Get my IP address. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 21:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Yamla (talk) 21:46, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, 2025 Shahid Rajaee Port Explosion

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2025 Shahid Rajaee Port Explosion. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2025 Port of Shahid Rajaee explosion. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2025 Port of Shahid Rajaee explosion. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. David O. Johnson (talk) 17:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sulaymaniyah massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Kirkuk executions (1991)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Kirkuk executions (1991)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jiltedsquirrel 🌰 ^{(talk || contribs)} 02:19, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Execution of Ali Hassan al-Majid, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 16:22, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eejit43,

Thanks for your feedback. I understand your concerns about notability, but I believe the execution of Ali Hassan al-Majid is significant enough to stand alone due to its coverage in major outlets like The Guardian, and Amnesty International.

I added more details/sources on the article nowKuripenjwen (talk) 16:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I even added BBC which is a very strong source Kuripenjwen (talk) 16:50, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

--Finngall ^talk 17:58, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]