Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Chhattisgarh

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Chhattisgarh. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Chhattisgarh|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Chhattisgarh. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to India.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Chhattisgarh/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Articles for deletion

Pawan Roy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable singer, with non notable award. Lacks Wp:SIGCOV and fails wp:GNG and Wp:NMUSIC. Creator is blocked and the article is not yet reviewed. Zuck28 (talk) 08:24, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists, Bands and musicians, India, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, and Odisha. Zuck28 (talk) 08:24, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable. Aneirinn (talk) 20:21, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails to meet WP:MUSICIAN. From the sources, the singer seems a rather local singer and not of national or international level. The significant coverage on the subject is also missing. Shows one award won but this award is not notable and rather a local award. RangersRus (talk) 09:45, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Kanker clash

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable clash. Fails WP:NOTNEWS and WP:EVENT. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 20:42, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and India. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 20:42, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Military, and Chhattisgarh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly Oppose:

The Article is part of a wider Naxalite-Maoist insurgency in india which have been ongoing for decades, its a low-level insurgency for past many years so mass casuality events are rare.

Only two articles represent a mass casuality event in the insurgency in the whole year of 2024 one is above mentioned and the other being 2024 Abujhmarh clash, so it not just a regular news and the event have been reported by Foreign media outlets, which is rare.

From a wider perspective, articles that represent mass casualities of the maoist rebels have been targeted for deletion recently. Eg:-

It is part of a larger operation ongoing since 2024 to end the insurgency by March 2026.

While articles which portray Government casualities have been left out from deletion even though they are underdeveloped and represent less casuality events like

Deleting this article and leaving out the others will shift the neutrality of the Insurgency, with possible downplaying rebel casualities and highlighting government casualities observed for wikipedia viewers. Golem469 (talk) 08:47, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"the event have been reported by Foreign media outlets" – Can you cite a source? I don't see any.

All these articles should be held to the same standard. If this article is deleted, you are welcome to delete/merge the others as well. This argument is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. — 🌊PacificDepths (talk) 22:31, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We need more participation and evaluation of sources here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We need to hear from more editors.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Summary: While this event attracted coverage in multiple news outlets, there was not significant re-analysis or lasting coverage. This content would be better suited as part of a larger article about the broader conflict that has been ongoing since 2024. Following WP:EVENTCRIT:

Does this event have enduring significance, meet WP:GNG, or have a significant WP:LASTING effect? No, as this is one of a string of clashes in the broader conflict that have put up routine news.
Is there widespread impact, diverse coverage, or re-analysis? No.
WP:GEOSCOPE: Yes, notable in national news
WP:DEPTH: Yes, There is some coverage with context such as The Week.
WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE: No, There is not much continued coverage; stories are washed out amongst other days of conflict.
WP:DIVERSE: Yes, This passes between Times of India, The Week, and Indian Express.

— 🌊PacificDepths (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: one last try for quorum
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 07:00, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]