Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veena Nandakumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:49, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Veena Nandakumar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article falls short of NACTOR & does not have in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence falls short of GNG also. Celestina007 (talk) 08:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 08:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 08:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 08:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 08:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 08:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 08:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant coverage, fails NACTOR by miles or so. --qedk (t 桜 c) 13:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete totally fails the notability guidelines for actresses.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:05, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete subject doesnt have significant coverage thus fails general notability guidelines. The subject fails notability guidelines for actors as well. —usernamekiran(talk) 06:59, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails pass notability. --SalmanZ (talk) 16:15, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete: The actress may become more notable in the future, but I think it's WP:TOOSOON for an article just yet. Dflaw4 (talk) 10:26, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.