Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenOcean (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OpenOcean

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hard to locate the references for it to pass WP:ORG. Juggyevil (talk) 21:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Lack of notability in references to article as currently written. Also reads promotional. Gusfriend (talk) 06:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sourcing appears to be adequate to establish notability. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 05:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article about an investment vehicle, summarising their incoming funds and investment portfolio. A previous article about this firm was discussed at AfD in December 2020 and then deleted; the comments in that discussion seem equally applicable to this new instance. Both funding rounds and investment announcement coverage fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH; nor is being one of the first round investors in MariaDB Corporation inherently notable. I don't see any reason to diverge from the December 2020 AfD consensus that this topic fails to meet the WP:NCORP criteria. AllyD (talk) 12:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.