Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Saifullah
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 18:13, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Muhammad Saifullah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable subject: This article covers Muhammad Saifullah, an Islamic scholar from Sindh, Pakistan. The current sources, primarily YouTube videos and Facebook pages, fail Wikipedia’s guidelines on reliable sourcing (WP:RS) and notability (WP:GNG). The subject lacks significant independent coverage and prominence, making him unsuitable for inclusion. Additionally, recent confusion regarding subject identity further confirms unclear notability. Thus, deletion per WP:GNG and WP:RS is recommended. PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 17:24, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Islam, and Pakistan. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Doesn't seem to have anything in Gscholar; a similar name pops up for a researcher in photovoltaics. I don't see a pass at notability for scholars. Sourcing now in the article is not useful, as explained and I can't find anything about this person otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 19:35, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Notability not found in GNG either. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC).
- Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:11, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.