Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Frumess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:04, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Frumess

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not having any notable works, lack of secondary sources supporting notability. - The9Man ^Talk 08:20, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Film. - The9Man ^Talk 08:20, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Music, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There are already multiple pages that link to it. A project he's directed has already been deemed notable for an entry. The page can also be rewritten as needed, and there are more sources to draw from. -Disco dude rock (talk) 02:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I found some coverage of his works and added it - the guy isn't the most well-known person, but there's just enough to establish notability. The article definitely needs to be pruned to only include what content can be verified. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:04, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - there's been some improvement since this was nominated, but it could be improved further. The self-published source needs to be moved to external links, and the unsourced material needs citations or cuts. Bearian (talk) 07:15, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.