Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IV.AI (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IV.AI

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A previous instance was deleted at AfD in 2018. This new instance is sourced to generic references about AI but I am not seeing the specific references about this company which would be needed to demonstrate that notability has now been attained. AllyD (talk) 09:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, again, not notable. I hope it's not paid editing. The creator of the previously deleted version, Banassac, was indeffed for promotional editing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Fails WP:SIRS Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. With one exception, all of the sources that even mention the company (Cybernews, Lifewire, USNews CNBC, BBC, WaPo, Fox News) only contain a single trivial mention of the company when discussing a quote from the company's CEO, which wouldn't be significant coverage for the individual, let alone the company. This Wired article is the only source that mentions the company more than once in any context, and even that is rather trivial coverage that falls short of being significant coverage. While I found a few things that discussed the company online such as press releases and a non-independent source, I found nothing that would contribute towards notability for the article's subject. - Aoidh (talk) 18:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Aaron Liu (talk) 17:15, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.