Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datamatics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Datamatics

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 12:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 12:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Software, and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – This subject does not seem notable and lacks news coverage from independent reliable sources. Mysecretgarden (talk) 07:21, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - a Google search brings up many other news articles about them. They are an Indian public company. We can't also just assume all Indians publications are bad. Here are some of the other articles I have found: 1, 2, 3, 4. Shinadamina (talk) 10:05, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shinadamina only link number 3 makes partial sense but still it fails because of CORPTRIV, as it focuses on changes in share price. Please provide a SIRS table. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 13:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can find a good example of a SIRS table in this AfD, which you can easily create by using the following Template:Source assess table. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 13:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of the references meet GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:12, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails to meet notability guidelines, as it lacks sufficient independent and reliable secondary sources to establish the company's significance. --Kej Keir (talk) 08:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.