Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BAA Training

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Sourcing is insufficient. A redirect may be created as a matter of editorial discretion, but there's no clear target here. Star Mississippi 14:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BAA Training

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Refs are routine business news and annoucements scope_creep^Talk 18:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Schools, Aviation, and Lithuania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good referencing meeting basic media coverage requirements and generally notable company as the biggest on Europe airplane pilots training establishmnet; also checked local newspapers in Lithunian and found coverage in the best local media like 15min, vz.lt, etc. Definitely keep it, but the language and tone should be changed to meet Wikipedia-neutral language. I also added some good sources and events to the page. BoraVoro (talk) 13:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you post WP:THREE reference so we can see what references you found, because I don't think there is anything apart from the usual trade PR and press-releases. scope_creep^Talk 19:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

already added to the page BoraVoro (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both those references you added to the article fail WP:ORGIND and WP:SIRS. The first one states: "Textron Aviation says on its website that the contract was signed during last week's", so that is a press-release. The second one "Vytautas Jankauskas, executive director of BAA Training Vietnam, said in the announcement." fails WP:ORGIND and WP:SIRS. I think your a UPE dude. scope_creep^Talk 09:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the sources are more like press-releases. But, I didn't tell I added three best sources (as you may think), but I added some new sources to the page. My fault that reply sounded like "I did find and added". And please refrain from blaming me in some sort of promotion, as it is even prohibited by by Wikipedia. I think there is some rule, that the article and sources should be discussed, not people. BoraVoro (talk) 10:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.elnacional.cat/es/tecnologia/los-pilotos-de-air-india-se-formaran-en-lleida-alguaire_1112328_102.html kind of good source. But I'm not sure if it passes Orgind BoraVoro (talk) 10:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 01:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete. Nothing but an advert. - Altenmann >talk 02:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:Promotion, simple. CSMention269 (talk) 09:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect: An article setting out the wares of a training subsidiary company. Announcement-based coverage is insufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH, as is coverage mentioning the firm as a training provider, such as the El Nacional item mentioned above. Fails WP:NCORP; a redirect to Avia Solutions Group where it is briefly covered could be an option. AllyD (talk) 16:12, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It may need to be shortened a bit to meet encyclopedic requirements, but there is no reason to doubt the article's significance --Well I dont (talk) 10:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editor is a WP:SPA and likely a UPE. scope_creep^Talk 15:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Maybe the whole article is UPE as assumed by creep. Okoslavia (talk) 07:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.