Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appointment Trader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:35, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appointment Trader

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like a promotioin and the platform doesn't seem significant enough. Thewikizoomer (talk) 17:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article could use an edit, but there is substantial coverage of Appointment Trader, most notably in the New York Times and the San Francisco Chronicle. JSFarman (talk) 05:06, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, Software, Websites, Florida, and Nevada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:09, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the NY Times and SF Chronicle are good sources; I found this [1], from the Evening Standard (which is sort-of RS), so we should have enough to keep the article. Oaktree b (talk) 23:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.