Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Markaz al-Islami Skardu Baltistan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 22:12, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Markaz al-Islami Skardu Baltistan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG, WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 06:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:02, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:02, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:02, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - WP:ORG does not apply to this as it appears to be a "non-profit educational institution" (or alternatively as it is related to a religion or sect). Therefore the only question to be answered is whether it qualifies for WP:GNG. The only reference I could find in Gbooks to it was here, where the snippet reads: ""This is why we did not witness any major retaliatory act of violence in Skardu and Ismaili majority areas," Hussain says. In Skardu, some disgruntled protesters did try to attack al-Markaz al-Islami —the main Ahle Hadees madrassah in Baltistan...". Therefore, at least one reliable source (The Herald of Pakistan) refers to it as an institution of at least some level of notability (an important institution for a notable Islamic sect). However I don't think this snippet by itself is enough to keep the article. At the same time I am hesitant to vote delete unless the non-English-language sources have been reviewed by someone who speaks the language. This is especially because of the difficulty in trying to assess the notability of this article given the wide range of different romanisations of the various parts of the name of the place. FOARP (talk) 08:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PS - the article references "Jon Krakauer (2011-07-01). Three Cups of Deceit: How Greg Mortenson, Humanitarian Hero, Lost His Way. Anchor Books. p. ?. ISBN 978-0307948762." - has anyone had a chance to review this? FOARP (talk) 08:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 21:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - unless somebody can find non-English articles to support notability. There don't appear to be any in English. Ira Leviton (talk)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.