Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adil Demirci

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After two re-lists, there is no consensus to Delete (non-admin closure) Britishfinance (talk) 18:17, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adil Demirci (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable journalist. One of the many thousands of journalist who have been detained in Turkey on similar charges, and no really special features or significance to this particular instance of their repressive policies. My PROD was declined, with a suggestion of renaming. Idon't see how that would help. "Detention of Adil Demrici "is no more notable than the individual, and "release of Adil Demrici" is not notable because only one of the sources is about it. DGG ( talk ) 20:56, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:10, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:10, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:10, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:36, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Lean to Keep, however, refs need to be provided at AfD that show GNG; try a re-list
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 01:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.