User talk:GangesCommander

Welcome!

Hi GangesCommander! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Sweetabena (talk) 09:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, I'm Pbritti. I noticed that you recently made an edit in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edit summaries claim to be updates, but are often unexplained and disruptive changes that do nothing to provide an update. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:09, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bakhtar40. I noticed that you recently removed content from CK Birla Group without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bakhtar40 (talk) 02:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the explanation now for every user to see GangesCommander (talk) 07:22, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siemens Healthineers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Multinational. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

Please do not move pages unnecessary as you did with Chenani–Nashri Tunnel. Before performing a page move, please make sure you visit the talk page. If you believe the page should be renamed, please open a RM discussion rather than making controversial moves. For more information, see WP:RM#CM and WP:MOVE. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why i moved pages is because the new title of the article was moved based on the references before the renaming of the tunnel. The User moved pages based on misleading explanation. I simply reverted it back. GangesCommander (talk) 09:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading explanation? Please refer to the article's talk page, where the reason is provided. You will need to open a new RM discussion to present your justification, rather than moving pages without reviewing the talk page. Read the difference between WP:COMMONNAME and WP:OFFICIALNAMES. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

as i have stated earlier, the reason giving for moving the name is misleading. The reason is based on reference from 4 news articles, and one can clear see all these articles were published on the Tunnel was inaugurated. I know diferrance between between WP:COMMONNAME and WP:OFFICIALNAMES. The Common name for Tunnel is Dr Shyama Prasad Mookerjee Tunnel. GangesCommander (talk) 11:38, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain it to me how Dr Shyama Prasad Mookerjee Tunnel is the common name? I would like to learn more about it. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:23, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Government of India has named it ass such, it is colloquially known as such. All Alphabet/Google apps including maps recognize it as such. GangesCommander (talk) 12:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please provide evidence to support your claims? I am eager to learn more about this development. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

here is the official government notification [1]. And you check it on Google maps by yourself. GangesCommander (talk) 13:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! But that does not appear to be a common name. It seems you may have misunderstood our policy. Here are the Google Maps results. I suggest reviewing WP:COMMONNAME for clarity. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Bijapur. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Do a proper move request RfC in the talk page the older one instead of undiscussed unilateral moves. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohsin and Zuber Issa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chenani–Nashri Tunnel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ramban.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naxalite–Maoist insurgency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CRPF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II operators

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II operators, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Axedd (talk) 08:20, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kush Desai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shahid Afridi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BSF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did at 2025 Pakistani strikes in Kashmir. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you think that the page should be deleted, please read Wikipedia:How to delete a page. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. — AP 499D25 (talk) 09:28, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahendra Nath Mulla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Provinces.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arun Khetarpal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ace of aces.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Flyingphoenixchips. I noticed that you removed topically relevant content from Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Kindly do not remove content in pages without WP:CONSENSUS. Also use proper edit summaries. Do not remove sources added by others. If there is an issue bring it up to the forum or open an RfC to resolve the issue. If a statement is sourced then it should only be removed post consensus. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 02:40, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Wipro Enterprises. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Yuvaank (talk) 06:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Dassault Mirage 2000, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. The reasons provided in the edit summary are insufficient and clearly do not reflect a consensus. As a reminder, editors are expected to maintain a higher standard when editing in contentious topic areas. To be quite honest, your edits have the appearance of POV-pushing behavior. I'd strongly suggest discussing further removals of sourced content and gaining consensus before making further such edits. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:18, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a final warning -- the next time you cause disruption in the India-Pakistan conflict area, such as blanking or POV pushing, you are going to be topic-banned from this area for 1 year. Your edits appear to be consistently removing well sourced content (New York Times, Washington Post, etc.) in instances that are favorable to Pakistan or negative to India; under the deceptive label of being "excessive". If you are unable to follow our policies and edit neutrally in a contentious topic area, in which we expected editors to be on their best behavior, you will be removed from editing said topic. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:56, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 22:12, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]