User talk:Queen of Hearts/Archive 12
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Queen of Hearts. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 |
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Huddersfield sex abuse ring on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
NPP Awards for 2024
|
The New Page Reviewer's NPP Barnstar Award | |
| This award is given in recognition to Queen of Hearts for conducting 173 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC) |
Question from Di (they-them) (23:35, 15 January 2025)
Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely)! charlotte 👸♥ 23:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)"America's Hitler" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect America's Hitler has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 16 § America's Hitler until a consensus is reached. BarntToust 22:29, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Darryl De Sousa
On 17 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Darryl De Sousa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Darryl De Sousa created a Baltimore Police Department unit to give lie detector tests to other units? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Darryl De Sousa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Darryl De Sousa), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Launchballer 00:03, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Doug Hamlin
On 23 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Doug Hamlin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Doug Hamlin vowed to recruit more women and minorities to the National Rifle Association? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Doug Hamlin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Doug Hamlin), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Recent revdel
You should probably revdel the edit summary too on this edit. mwwv converse∫edits 17:57, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Forgot to note this was
Done. charlotte 👸♥ 00:30, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
ITN revert
Thanks for reverting that inadvertent ITN protection of mine. While, I somewhat remember accidentally tapping some side panel protection link while on tablet, I don't remember pressing "save" and could swear I pressed "back". Embarrassing. Thanks again. —Bagumba (talk) 00:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Happens to the best of us, @Bagumba; there are much worse buttons you could've hit
charlotte 👸♥ 01:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
A pie for you!
|
Thank you for your new edit filter, 1338. I was looking for links to Gulf of America, but this is so much better :) win8x (talk) 21:21, 22 January 2025 (UTC) |
- You're welcome, @win8x; hopefully the buzz around the EO will calm down soon, but never know in this world. charlotte 👸♥ 01:17, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gary Tuggle
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gary Tuggle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 05:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Your WikiCup submission: Talk:The Man Who Knew Too Much (Alexander McQueen collection)/GA1
Hi Queen of Hearts, thanks for participating in the WikiCup. You recently submitted Talk:The Man Who Knew Too Much (Alexander McQueen collection)/GA1 for GANR points in the WikiCup. Unfortunately, the review is not long enough; besides the standard GA criteria check and spot check, it seems you left only one minor comment about the sources. As per Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, such reviews are ineligible for points; you can only claim points for sufficiently detailed reviews. – Epicgenius (talk) 15:07, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gary Tuggle
The article Gary Tuggle you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gary Tuggle and Talk:Gary Tuggle/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gary Tuggle
The article Gary Tuggle you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Gary Tuggle for comments about the article, and Talk:Gary Tuggle/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 23:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Suggestion to filter 1338
On the filter's title, it says new users
so maybe we should limit the filter to only non-confirmed users? Also, should we need to set the filter to warn and tag (because most hits appear to be disruptive), we should first get consensus at the edit filter noticeboard. Thank you. Codename Noreste (talk) 19:19, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
"T:RFXR" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect T:RFXR has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 31 § T:RFXR until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:07, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Tamzin Hadasa Kelly RFD
Hello, you participated in an RFD discussion for Tamzin Hadasa Kelly, which redirects to the encyclopedia article Wikipedia administrators#Requests for adminship. However, several people (including me) misinterpreted it as a redirect to projectspace, it seemed like we couldn't have an accurate discussion, so I've closed the discussion and renominated it at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 2#Tamzin Hadasa Kelly. Please go there to participate again, and if your opinion at the first RFD still applies, please feel free to copy/paste your rationale from before. Nyttend (talk) 22:41, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Crabs for Christmas
On 3 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Crabs for Christmas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the writer of "Crabs for Christmas" joked that it contributed to Baltimore's population decline? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Crabs for Christmas. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Crabs for Christmas), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
January 2025 NPP backlog drive – Points award
|
The Invisible Barnstar | |
| This award is given in recognition to Queen of Hearts for accumulating at least 5 points during the January 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 16,000+ articles and 14,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 19,791.2 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC) |
GAR
Hi, could you please revert your recent GAR closes? The closing period was recently changed to a month. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:50, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29: Not sure how to feel about that, but I think I reverted everything. charlotte 👸♥ 19:16, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, and yeah, me neither. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29: - How does this new standard interact with seemingly uncontroversial keep closes? Are my closes at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Supermarine Spitfire/1 and Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Pine Island Glacier/1 problematic? Surely a reassessment where all involved parties agree that it should be kept is exempt from the month, right? This would also apply to one of Q of H's vacated closes - Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ronnie Barker/1, although that articles does include a single citation to IMDB yet. Hog Farm Talk 04:58, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- I'd IAR, as I have done previously Hog Farm. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:41, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29: - How does this new standard interact with seemingly uncontroversial keep closes? Are my closes at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Supermarine Spitfire/1 and Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Pine Island Glacier/1 problematic? Surely a reassessment where all involved parties agree that it should be kept is exempt from the month, right? This would also apply to one of Q of H's vacated closes - Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ronnie Barker/1, although that articles does include a single citation to IMDB yet. Hog Farm Talk 04:58, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, and yeah, me neither. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Republican Party (United States) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
Gorbachev GAR
I've cut Gorbachev down to 11,500 words from a rather long 17,000. Hope that meets your concerns. It'd be appreciated if you could say what you now think on the GAR page. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Didn't manage to comment before closure but fyi, I don't have any objections to the GAR being closed as keep. I give @Chiswick Chap for going through and fixing and shortening up the article, and doing "my job" of summarising the Leader of the Soviet Union section. All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (Ughhh.... What did I do wrong this time?) 08:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Benjamin Schreiber (criminal)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Benjamin Schreiber (criminal) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MolecularPilot -- MolecularPilot (talk) 05:24, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Thanks!
|
The Happy Doogs Award |
| Thanks for the help! In fact 54,129 thank yous :) Fortuna, Imperatrix Mundi 11:52, 15 February 2025 (UTC) |
- You're welcome, Fortuna imperatrix mundi! charlotte 👸♥ 14:27, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Queen of Hearts, it has been two days short of five months since you last posted to your review of this GA nomination, and you haven't responded to multiple queries there about the status of your review, despite significant editing activity elsewhere.
On February 21, it will have been a full five months. If you haven't responded by then with your plans—if you haven't edited on Wikipedia in the interim, I will naturally wait until you have edited so you have a chance to respond—I will request a second opinion in the hopes of getting a reviewer to finish up the review. Thank you for your attention to this and your understanding. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:22, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, BlueMoonset – I'm surprised this hasn't already happened, please do so. For the record, I'm pretty sure it just needs a spotcheck. charlotte 👸♥ 14:27, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
NPP
Hi. Did you intend to give this user the NPP flag along with their PCR? They raised a query because they didn't apply for it and did not know what Page Curation was. They know what to do now and will probably (hopefully) use it once they have read the instructions. I might even give them some training if I have time. NPP has a very steep learning curve and not all good AfC reviewers are aware of it. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:41, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Kudpung, apologies for the late reply. I trust that Qcne's AfC experience will translate into NPP, although I will admit that me granting him NPP without tilling him anything about it was subpar. charlotte 👸♥ 14:27, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- No worries. Because it requires a near admin level of notability and deletion policies the right is generally only accorded at WP:PERM (like other requests for user rights) after a thorough vetting, and a proven track record and need for the extra tools. In the first instance, NPP is usually granted on probation for 30 days. If you haven't already done so, do check out the PERM requests, it often gets backlogged and coulddo with some help. Take care, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:37, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Gary Tuggle
On 27 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gary Tuggle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gary Tuggle, as head of Philadelphia's Drug Enforcement Administration division, led potentially the largest prepackaged heroin seizure in Delaware history? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gary Tuggle. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gary Tuggle), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Your WikiCup submission: Template:Did you know nominations/Gary Tuggle
Hi Queen of Hearts, thanks for participating in the WikiCup. You recently submitted Template:Did you know nominations/Gary Tuggle for DYK points, but unfortunately it is not eligible for DYK points because it was nominated to DYK as a newly promoted GA. I know this can be disappointing, but Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring#Did you know? states that only newly created or expanded DYKs are eligible for DYK points. The rules specifically exclude DYK submissions from receiving points if their appearance on DYK is solely because the article was a newly promoted GA. – Epicgenius (talk) 15:58, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
NPR
Hi, just asking because you were the one who granted it, but could you remove my NPR right? Thanks! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 04:04, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Already done charlotte 👸♥ 00:50, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
| For User:Queen of Hearts/uw-vandalismshot. Extremely clever idea, very well executed.
All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:48, 26 February 2025 (UTC) |
- Heh, you're welcome Alachuckthebuck! charlotte 👸♥ 00:50, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Admin's Barnstar | |
| Thanks for doing the administrative actions and clearing the backlog! Xiphoid Vigour ||⚔|⚔|| 12:41, 2 March 2025 (UTC) |
- Thank you Xiphoid Vigour; you're welcome! charlotte 👸♥ 21:13, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
I saw that you left the Discord. I hope you're doing alright and that you have a wonderful rest of your day.
Sebbog13 (talk) 20:03, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Sebbog13; I am well, just trying to take a break. charlotte 👸♥ 21:13, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Benjamin Schreiber (criminal)
On 6 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Benjamin Schreiber (criminal), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Benjamin Schreiber argued that his life sentence ended after he was resuscitated? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Benjamin Schreiber (criminal). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Benjamin Schreiber (criminal)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 9,781 views (815.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2025 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Syntax errors in mass message
You should have received an error message when you tried to send this mass message, saying that it contained three syntax errors. Did you receive an error message? This is the fix. Please arrange to have the errors fixed on all of the pages to which the message was delivered. Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Tasks is a good place to ask for help. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:28, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Jonesey95: Gah! No, I did not receive an error. Normally I'd be able to fix this myself, but seeing as I am presently stuck on a Mac (so no AWB, and JWB wouldn't work well here), I've asked at AWBREQ. charlotte 👸♥ 20:52, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
- Done by the great DreamRimmer. charlotte 👸♥ 20:39, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Benjamin Schreiber (criminal)
The article Benjamin Schreiber (criminal) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Benjamin Schreiber (criminal) for comments about the article, and Talk:Benjamin Schreiber (criminal)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MolecularPilot -- MolecularPilot (talk) 06:06, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
GAN Backlog Drive
Could you please update the Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/January 2025 page so that I can tallyup your points for you? Thanks! IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 18:39, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Could you please explain this log entry? Primefac (talk) 11:08, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I believe that action was so that the recipient could make a singular empty edit/null edit to a TE protected page (to update template data). Granting the right for a short-period is not how I would have done it, I would have asked them which page it was and made the null edit myself. That being said, I do believe Chew has a fairly solid history of working on templates and associated doc pages and I would trust them with permanent TE if they had some experience working on TE-protected sandboxes (etc). Sohom (talk) 17:06, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Copying a chat log into the rights log is probably not the best way to get that information across. Primefac (talk) 21:23, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- I would like a response from QoH, if possible. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:44, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Apologies for the delay, @Primefac & @Primefac – Sohom pretty much has it, although it was not for a single instance (I would have also done it myself if that were the case). Bit of a weird usecase, but I trust Chew to not do stupid things with TE (and I only granted for a month, in case she did do stupid things). charlotte 👸♥ 22:11, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- gah, meant to ping @Sdrqaz charlotte 👸♥ 22:11, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the response, but I think that the real issue – Primefac may disagree – is copying off-wiki chat logs to Wikipedia. I believe that these messages were probably copied from Discord, but a previous RfC held that Discord logs should be treated the same as IRC logs and should therefore be suppressed. I noticed that you did so for several users' rights logs; while they may have disclosed that they are active on Discord, I don't believe that they have disclosed which accounts belong to them (authentication doesn't count, per the RfC) and whether their comments can be copied over. In light of all that, please don't copy off-wiki comments to Wikipedia, as it falls foul of WP:OUTING. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:00, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Sdrqaz I guess a follow-up question to ask would be "If a user requests rights off-wiki, and there isn't a credible reason to refuse/deny the right, what would be the optimal way to document said interaction for posterity ?". Sohom (talk) 16:24, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- "Discussed on IRC, demonstrated understanding + trusted user" or similar. Primefac (talk) 17:05, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- I have also given permissions with similar log entries. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:09, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- That is acceptable, or alternatively you may wish to direct them to PERM (though that may be too bureaucratic for some people). I don't do private PERM requests (apart from IPBE, where the preferred requesting method is private) due to issues of transparency, accountability, and consistency. Like I said, not everyone's cup of tea to direct people to PERM, so Primefac's solution is fine. Sdrqaz (talk) 17:24, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- Basically the log entry needs to make it clear to those reading the logs why you made the change (and Primefac's suggestion is fine for that), without outing anybody, sharing private conversations, or requiring people to hunt for context. Thryduulf (talk) 19:31, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oh okay, fair, makes sense. I (mis)-interpreted/read Sdrqaz's assertion and assumed that we were disallowed from mentioning the existence of the discussion and the fact that the user had a account on IRC/Discord as well (unless the user explicitly discloses it). On reading the response back, it is much clearer. Sohom (talk) 00:08, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- If the user has disclosed they are active on discord then mentioning that in a log is unproblematic. If they haven't disclosed that then saying "off wiki" is preferable to "on discord", but doing so is not disclosing personal information or outing. Thryduulf (talk) 00:11, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oh okay, fair, makes sense. I (mis)-interpreted/read Sdrqaz's assertion and assumed that we were disallowed from mentioning the existence of the discussion and the fact that the user had a account on IRC/Discord as well (unless the user explicitly discloses it). On reading the response back, it is much clearer. Sohom (talk) 00:08, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Basically the log entry needs to make it clear to those reading the logs why you made the change (and Primefac's suggestion is fine for that), without outing anybody, sharing private conversations, or requiring people to hunt for context. Thryduulf (talk) 19:31, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- "Discussed on IRC, demonstrated understanding + trusted user" or similar. Primefac (talk) 17:05, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- I don't want to be difficult or self-important, QoH, but do you have a response to this? You don't need to agree with my interpretation of policy, but if the interpretation is right, I think that this is a pretty serious issue that needs some sort of acknowledgement. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:55, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Sdrqaz – yes, I agree with your interpretation (don't think there's any other way to interpret that RfC, which I was unaware of). Seeing as no one has objected to FBelow's plan, I'll do the revdels and null changes; I assume that one of the four oversighters that have participated in this discussion will OS them. charlotte 👸♥ 02:05, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- done and done charlotte 👸♥ 02:16, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Mòran taing. Primefac (talk) 13:04, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- done and done charlotte 👸♥ 02:16, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Sdrqaz – yes, I agree with your interpretation (don't think there's any other way to interpret that RfC, which I was unaware of). Seeing as no one has objected to FBelow's plan, I'll do the revdels and null changes; I assume that one of the four oversighters that have participated in this discussion will OS them. charlotte 👸♥ 02:05, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Sdrqaz I guess a follow-up question to ask would be "If a user requests rights off-wiki, and there isn't a credible reason to refuse/deny the right, what would be the optimal way to document said interaction for posterity ?". Sohom (talk) 16:24, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- Charlotte, I think this could be fixed by adding an additional entry to Chew's user right log explaining your rationale without the Discord logs. I'm not sure whether there should be a link to this talk thread in the log to explain why the earlier details were revdelled, but it would help clarify confusion. No worries if another admin objects to this approach. Fathoms Below (talk) 19:42, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- Sure. Note that this isn't the only log entry with such chat logs, though. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:55, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- I'm sure glad somebody brought this up, then. This is a facet I hadn't yet internalized... BusterD (talk) 13:47, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Sure. Note that this isn't the only log entry with such chat logs, though. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:55, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the response, but I think that the real issue – Primefac may disagree – is copying off-wiki chat logs to Wikipedia. I believe that these messages were probably copied from Discord, but a previous RfC held that Discord logs should be treated the same as IRC logs and should therefore be suppressed. I noticed that you did so for several users' rights logs; while they may have disclosed that they are active on Discord, I don't believe that they have disclosed which accounts belong to them (authentication doesn't count, per the RfC) and whether their comments can be copied over. In light of all that, please don't copy off-wiki comments to Wikipedia, as it falls foul of WP:OUTING. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:00, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Page mover
Thanks for page mover, I'll bother you less about moves now lol ULPS (talk • contribs) 02:49, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for putting an end to that. I was wondering when it was going to be snowballed after the first seven keep votes and offer of withdrawal. Cheers, MediaKyle (talk) 21:15, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Darryl De Sousa
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Darryl De Sousa you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 22:44, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Citizen: My Life After the White House
Hello, Queen of Hearts. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Citizen: My Life After the White House".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Gothus consobrinus
Hello, Queen of Hearts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gothus consobrinus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Thank you
Hi - without wanting to be (overly) sentimental, I just want to say thank you for being number 1 on my RfA. I wasn't overly anxiety ridden, but well, let's say the coritzol levels were somewhat elevated when I hit publish. That you were the first support, that it was an admin, that it happened within a few short minutes, led to a genuine cascade of relief. Thank you for being so welcoming and expressing your trust. Kind regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 22:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hey Goldsztajn, you're welcome. I'm usually quick to see the RfAs thanks to a combo of watching WP:RFA, having a script that shows my watchlist at the top of every page, and being on WP too much. Good luck with the mop, and let me know if I could be of assistance. charlotte 👸♥ 20:58, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Notification of administrators without tools
|
Greetings, Queen of Hearts. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
| |