Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Dance

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Dance. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Dance|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Dance. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Dance/archive

Purge page cache

watch

AFDs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎ per G5 by Hey man im josh. Procedural close. (non-admin closure) Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:15, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sahar Hashmi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Moved to draft by another editor but draftification was objected to by creator. References are all unreliable or not in-depth about the subject, just verification of roles but mainly non-bylined churnalism. CNMall41 (talk) 01:47, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and Pakistan. CNMall41 (talk) 01:47, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Dance, and Television. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:56, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This Pakistani actress is new emerging actress appeared in many notable television shows and Notable actors like Danish Taimoor. Some sources are unreliable and i acknowledge them but The Express Tribune, The News International and Geo TV are reliable sources. I vote to keep the article and i can clarify further assistance. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sackiii (talk • contribs) Sock strike--CNMall41 (talk) 19:50, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: 2 lead roles in notable series (one [was] a redirect but it received coverage, Zulm (TV series), see history) and Mann Mast Malang. If the first is judged insufficiently notable for her to meet WP:NACTOR, redirect to Mann Mast Malang#Cast. Opposed to deletion. -Mushy Yank. 10:34, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to keep repeating this, but having two roles does not meet someone is inherently notable. Needs significant coverage. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:21, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not "having 2 roles"!!!!!!! It's having (at least) two LEAD (therefore significant) roles in notable productions. -Mushy Yank. 20:13, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting it was you who initially redirected Zulm prior to undoing that redirect after this AfD was started.--CNMall41 (talk) 19:28, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's a self-revert. For more about this kind of redirects and why I self-reverted some of them, including this one, see this .

As for WP:NACTOR, you just need coverage to verify the importance of the roles in the notable productions. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Raza (actor), please. -Mushy Yank. 20:11, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that is your assessment of NACTOR, but based on the link you provided for the AfD, myself and others disagree. That AfD is in no way supports your statement that "you just need coverage to verify the important of the roles in the notable productions." If you want to cite AFDs we have disagreed about we can also include this one and this one where you made the similar argument. Also, NACTOR says "may," not "is." Sorry to keep repeating that as well. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:49, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about the results of the AfDs nor about disagreements between given users.. The AfDs you link do not contain an extensive discussion about WP:NACTOR whereas the one I linked does. [And in the latter, who are the "others" who disagree on the fact that NACTOR is an independent path to notability that needs coverage to verify the importance of the roles in notable production, please?] I will leave it at that. -Mushy Yank. 13:30, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.