Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:REFUND)
Shortcuts
"WP:RFU" redirects here; not to be confused with requests to unblock or requests to unprotect.

    This page is not for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases:

    1. Restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or stale Articles for creation drafts (G13) or abandoned user subpages of non-contributors (U6)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator.
    2. Requesting that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft, to userspace or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). Be clear as to which namespace is intended, when requesting the restoration of a deleted article.

    This means that content deleted after discussion – through deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.

    Do not request that pages or media deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, U7, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11, G12, or G15 be undeleted here.

    Instructions for special cases:

    Enter the page's title:



    Siege of Taliqan

    [edit]

    I am requesting undeletion of the article called Siege of Taliqan

    The article was originally being worked on for simple wikipedia where the other editor is not blocked and I wrote most of the article myself and I uploaded it to English Wikipedia on my own without being told to do so and it was not meant to help anyone get around a block

    I understand that this situation can look like proxy editing and uploading the article here was a mistake but there was no intention to evade a block or break policy

    If the page is restored I will make sure that all future edits on English Wikipedia are done independently and follow the rules

    Thank you for your time MunkhtushigTheGreatMongol (talk) 11:22, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Asilvering: Requestor was not blocked, but if you think this is a puppet, please block and delete. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:21, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Human Ejaculation.gif

    [edit]

    I wanted to upload a more upgraded file but new.Now I think I will just upload a new version of this file but not by deleting it. No reasoning given. —Jimmy257 (talk) 11:50, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I am not offering to restore this, but I will ask, why not upload to commons for a free movie. Is this educational or something else? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:56, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    World Soccer Champs

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Tumce23, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Tumce23 (talk) 13:50, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Infovision

    [edit]

    Multiple reliable sources are now available that were not reflected on the page at the time it was PRODed. —Terrvali (talk) 14:26, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Steven Macias

    [edit]

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ~2025-43371-93 (talk) 18:15, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. @~2025-43371-93: please see Help:Referencing for beginners Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:02, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Waiting for Your Love (disambiguation)

    [edit]

    I am trying to create a disambiguation page here, having found several uses of it as a song title and similar by searching for the term in quotes. —UltrasonicMadness (talk) 19:46, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:David Hynam

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm KP070707, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. KP070707 (talk) 21:05, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @KP070707: Not done – a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. BD2412 T 23:15, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Galacta

    [edit]

    Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galacta resulted in merge, but through some roundabout G5-worthy abuse, the history and content has now been lost entirely. —2pou (talk) 22:39, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @2pou: Done BD2412 T 23:09, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Master Dy

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Thony-Ferro, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. I've been very busy with college work, but from now on I have more free time. Thank you. Thony-Ferro (talk) 22:44, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Thony-Ferro: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412 T 23:10, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Galacta: Daughter of Galactus

    [edit]

    Same per 2pou above. Galacta: Daughter of Galactus was created in the 2000s, redirected, redirected again recently, and its history and content has now also been lost. ~2025-43818-54 (talk) 23:40, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Zohra Mojadeddi

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Miraclepine, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ミラP@Miraclepine 02:49, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Miraclepine: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:35, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Narhar Ambadas Kurundkar

    [edit]

    Hello, I would like to request the undeletion of this page, please move it to draftspace. The page was recently deleted on the ground of notability. I don't know why the nominator didn't perform WP:BEFORE. There is a full-length monograph on the subject published by Sahitya Akademi, India's National Academy of Letters, which is enough to establish notability. Pinging nominator @4meter4:, and voters @Tioaeu8943:, @Agnieszka653:. —Gazal world (talk) 12:33, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Certainly you may work on this in draft. It’s great that you found a monograph. That particular source didn’t come up in searches for me, and evidently not for others as well. Please don’t assume that a failure in source location means due diligence was not done. Not every search engine has the same results. Not everyone is as skilled at researching content. Google books in particular is notorious for being both location based and algorithm based. It has different results based on where you live and your past search history, and different countries have different access levels and collections in google books. In other words, editors are not likely to get the same search results even using the same search terms because of the way google is structured. Please assume good faith. On a side note, a DRV is likely to endorse this close because there was a clear consensus to delete. I suggest starting over from scratch based on the source you found. I note that where I live this source does not provide any preview and I believe the subject had ties to the school which published the monograph which may draw into question whether the source is sufficiently independent. For me this would still be a delete. 4meter4 (talk) 14:03, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @4meter4: The monograph is published by Sahitya Akademi which is the national literary academy of India. And there are more sources too. I just assumed that others may have not checked Google Books but you must be right that your results might have been different than mine. So sorry on my behalf. --Gazal world (talk) 19:43, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Gazal world: No worries. It's easy to get frustrated when it appears like editors are being careless or making decisions which are not perceived as reasonable. Just remember that editors are doing the best they know how. Source location has so many variables in it, that it really is not entirely predictable what one editor's BEFORE will return versus another editor's searches. That is one reason why we have AFD discussions in the first place, so that the community of editors as a whole can work towards source location. Someone living in India for example is likely to have a much larger library of India related materials available to them in google books, then say someone living in the UK or the USA. That's just one example. Anyway, it sounds like you have located GNG level sourcing, so I encourage you to just build a new article from scratch at Draft:Narhar Ambadas Kurundkar. Best wishes.4meter4 (talk) 19:52, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ashley Coleman (darts)

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm DartsF4, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. DartsF4 (talk) 13:52, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Paul Wesselényi

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Taiyaki Schizo, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft about a historical figure deleted under CSD G13 or U6. I am of the opinion that where possible Wikipedia should make articles about individual items in the same way that Wikidata tries to categorise everything to have one massive database of all that exists, by storing individual entities. While I understand criticism that this would lead to many short articles, in this case, other users contributed with more information of their own but I wasn't using Wikipedia much at the time and never ended up finalising the article. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Taiyaki Schizo (talk) 14:17, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Taiyaki Schizo please note that regardless of your personal opinions the subject must have the sources to show it is notable by our guideline on Wikipedia:Notability. Also you are mistaken about Wikidata: it does not try to "categorise everything" as you say, it has it's own notability policy at d:Wikidata:Notability. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 14:29, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I imagine there should be a 1-1 approach that if something is in Wikidata a page of it in Wikipedia can't be deleted for not being relevant. I think of Wikipedia as like a library where you can find information on anything which could be found in a book. I realise that some things seem almost irrelevant, but the whole is built off of smaller sections like individuals which often seem irrelevant because a narrative is easily dominated by more "important" things that catch the eye.
    To avoid being poetic, if we have information on something, and we know it has relevance to a topic people could have an interest in, it ought to be recorded as someone could find new importance in it.
    Separately, where are Wikipedia's policies on these things decided, since I realise I am preaching to the choir and you're just enforcing rules decided elsewhere.
    But anyway, WikiData already had him as an entity as he took part in a revolt deemed to be important but the limited historical information on him makes his importance a matter of debate, where I think he is important.
    In such a subjective situation, I think it is easy to understand we should err on the side of allowing it to be recorded. Taiyaki Schizo (talk) 19:01, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I have noticed by looking at Wikipedia talk pages that a surprising amount of time on Wikipedia is spent arguing about what Wikipedia is, so maybe the real Wikipedia was the editors we made along the way. :) Taiyaki Schizo (talk) 19:01, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Wikidata has a different scope. I am in Wikidata, but that certainly does not justify a Wikipedia article on me. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    My first reaction was "How did you end up in Wikidata", and from your user page, you seem to be quite a substantial contributor. There is precedent for important wikipedia editors to get their own wiki pages, and we have an article on wiki users who have done enough here to attract attentions and a "List of Wikipedia people". If you have done enough on Wikipedia that people want to know who you are and make an article detailing your acheivements, this has already been done for other Wiki users. Yes, enough attention does make a person important.
    I am having 2 different discussions on what feels like the same topic at once, the other being on my opinion that what was a very well-written article on the Namibian politician with the same name as Adolf Hitler should be brought back as the amount of attention brought to him by his name had led to research in an area that most people otherwise would not have bothered looking at, that being Namibian local politics. Local English politics, on the other hand, have tonnes of articles likely made by those politicians themselves or people who know them, and no one bats an eye since they are well-written and create the impression of importance. I see nothing wrong with that, Wikipedia is better for it. So, I would hope the same amount of detail would go into other parts of the world and rather than going "This person is important because I've never heard of them", itself already subject to much bias in terms of what we have already heard of, we can see it as an opportunity to find more information on a topic we otherwise would not have engaged with.
    I do not plan to argue with Wiki users though, as much as it somehow feels enjoyable to talk to others on the internet. I asked on another talk page where I have not yet got back a reply, but where exactly am I allowed to make a case that policy or the way it is implemented should be changed, and actually have a chance of succeeding? Taiyaki Schizo (talk) 10:32, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lutheran High School (St. Charles County, Missouri)

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm MissouriLutheran, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. MissouriLutheran (talk) 16:41, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:SaberZ

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Joseefitness, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 😊Joseefitness (talk) 18:49, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Join the Party

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm BOZ, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. BOZ (talk) 20:27, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Party of One

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm BOZ, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. BOZ (talk) 20:27, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Udi shapiro/Sample page

    [edit]

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ~2025-43919-27 (talk) 20:33, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lucas Sinclair

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm BushK12, and I would like to request the undeletion of the Lucas Sinclair draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. BushK12 (talk) 20:34, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Rachel Alig

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Filmforme, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Filmforme (talk) 20:40, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Steeple Gidding (village)

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Crouch, Swale, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:45, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. @Crouch, Swale: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:48, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:This Is Love (The Archies album)

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Jhlechner, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Jhlechner (talk) 20:52, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    • Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. @Jhlechner: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Graeme, thank you for the speedy response! This was the first Wikipedia article I ever created, and I'm sure I made a lot of rookie mistakes -- including not keeping a draft for myself! Since then, I've created 12 articles, and am much more aware of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I will work on the article as soon as it's undeleted.
      Many thanks,
      Jack Lechner Jhlechner (talk) 22:28, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @Jhlechner: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:11, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Thank you so much! Happy New Year! Jhlechner (talk) 15:13, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Manic Kat Records

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Wearefromjersey, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Wearefromjersey (talk) 23:46, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    • Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. @Wearefromjersey: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:12, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Pikabu Screenshot.png

    [edit]

    File:Pikabu Screenshot.png · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions] That file is useful for indicating Pikabu. Ahri Boy (talk) 01:14, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    In that case you had better talk to user talk:Explicit to explain why it does not "Violate non-free use policy" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:15, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Just informed him. Ahri Boy (talk) 04:27, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Tracie Ching

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Tratnula, and I would like to request the undeletion of this Draft:Tracie_Ching deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Tratnula (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Tratnula (talk) 04:07, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Tratnula: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:57, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Miss America Protest Freedom Trash Can.jpg

    [edit]

    I mistakenly replaced this picture in Miss America protest with one owned by Getty Images, which has been deleted recently. Therefore, I request the former be restored. —0x0a (talk) 06:47, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Godel, Escher, Bach (first edition).jpg

    [edit]

    please undelete the previous revisions to facilitate exporting to commons. —ltbdl (challenge) 06:47, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    You Saved My Life

    [edit]

    Please restore You Saved My Life, which was deleted as a proposed deletion. Here are sources about You Saved My Life:

    1. Vickery, Colin (2009-04-15). "Hero worshipper". Herald Sun. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "Tara Brown admits she has been a blubbering mess since the birth of her son, Jack, in October. The hormones have kicked in and the emotions are all over the map -- which makes her the perfect person to co-host Channel 9's You Saved My Life. The show is a three-hanky job. It tells the stories of people who have been saved in a life-or-death situation by a total stranger, an ordinary person who does the extraordinary, risking their own life to save another. Like Seven's Triple Zero Heroes, each episode ends with a reunion between the saver and the saved. Brown is there to interview each one about their emotion-charged meeting."

    2. McWhirter, Erin (2009-04-15). "Picks of the Week". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "Just when it seemed observational documentary series Find My Family was the only show capable of producing tears in even the most hardened of viewers, along comes a rival. Seasoned 60 Minutes reporter Tara Brown introduces former train guard Les Williams (pictured with Brown). Twenty-six years ago Williams leapt from a moving train to save the life of an 18-month-old boy playing on the tracks. One wrong move and little Gavin Armstrong (also pictured) and Williams would have met a tragic fate. Now, Williams meets Armstrong for the second time. Re-enactments might not be this program's strong point, but viewers will be so caught up in the real-life moments that the clunky moments fail to detract from the overall effect."

    3. Beaumont, Anita (2009-04-17). "Channel Surf". Newcastle Herald. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "Sometimes someone will make a split second decision that will change the lives of everyone involved. Like leaping from a moving train to save a toddler or going into a difficult situation to help someone in trouble with no thought for personal safety. This new heartstring-plucking series brings together the rescuers with the rescued for emotional reunions. Cue the violins and grab someone's sleeve to sniffle on. The emotions are real and touching, although there is a huge element of cheesiness — thanks to the soundtrack — that will hinder one's enthralment. 60 Minutes reporter Tara Brown (pictured) was keen to be involved once she was told about the experiences of some the people they would be featuring."

    4. Cronin, Seanna (2009-04-16). "Tara to the rescue". Play Magazine. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "Some real-life heroes are not comfortable with their title or the spotlight, as Tara Brown discovered in the new series You Saved My Life. The 60 Minutes reporter co-hosts the tear-jerk series, which reunites those who have been saved in a life threatening situation with their rescuer, with Dr Andrew Rochford Usually, Brown's work starts on location, where she interviews the rescuer at the spot where the event took place. But on a few occasions she rang people to try to convince them to be on the show."

    5. Rigney, Ellen (2009-04-19). "What's On". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "These are the incredible stories of people who were once complete strangers but are now inextricably linked by the extraordinary circumstances in which they met. Presented by Tara Brown (pictured) and Andrew Rochford, people who owe their lives to the courage of another are given the chance to reunite with their saviour to say thanks. ... While the featured people are inspiring and their stories are moving, repeated close-ups of the rescuer and rescuee hugging in slow motion tends to grate after a while."

    6. Tracy, Jackie (2009-04-19). "TV Guide". Sunday Mail. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "It's a pretty cool concept - bringing together rescuers and the people who owe them bigtime. And Nine's tasked 60 Minutes reporter Tara Brown and telegenic medic Andrew Rochford with upping Australia's tissue usage. In the premiere, rail guard Len Williams comes face to face with the baby he saved from certain death on the tracks. The infant is now a 26-year-old man keen to say thanks. Allana Arnott also finally meets her saviour 18 years after a plane crash in the Blue Mountains."

    7. Orr, Jasmin (2009-04-20). "Television". The Courier-Mail. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "Tara Brown and Andrew Rochford host this show, which is one of two new factual series on Nine and is reminiscent of two that air on Channel 7. This one reunites the rescued with the rescuer so the pair can relive the nightmare for the cameras. Opening up about their ordeal are Allana Arnott and Hugh Russell. Russell saved Arnott from a plane crash in the Blue Mountains 18 years ago."

    8. Brown, Jessie (2009-04-20). "highlights - TV & Stars". Newcastle Herald. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "This new show, hosted by Tara Brown and Dr Andrew Rochford (pictured), will have you reaching for the tissues. It tells the stories of ordinary people who have saved another person's life. Tonight we hear the story of Len Williams, a train driver who jumped from a moving train to pull a toddler off the tracks right before the Newcastle-to-Sydney express screamed past. Anyone who has travelled by train between Gosford and Newcastle will watch this program in disbelief at how lucky the toddler, now 26, was."

    9. Tracy, Jackie (2009-05-10). "TV Guide". Sunday Mail. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "The cut-to-the-chase title tells you all you need to know about this tear-jerker. But the genuine newsworthiness of its well-researched stories and the pacy re-enactments add an extra dimension to the reunions. Presenter Tara Brown's (pictured) 60 Minutes pedigree doesn't hurt and nor does the benign presence of TV medico Andrew Rochford. Tonight, flight attendant Greg Kahn and passenger Keith Charlton reunite six years after their bravery thwarted a hijacker on a seemingly routine Melbourne to Launceston flight. Kahn managed to wrestle the man to the ground, but took a savage beating for his pains. Charlton stepped in to save the have-a-go hero. Nice one."

    10. Meade, Amanda (2009-07-27). "The Diary". The Australian. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "You Saved My Life, hosted by 60 Minutes presenter Tara Brown and medico Andrew Rochford, was pulled, then put back again, but ended after just six episodes. You Saved My Life and Missing Pieces were cheap copycat programs which tried to cash in on the success of shows like Find My Family on Seven."

    11. Simmons, Lisa (2009-08-22). "McAvoy takes bit - of time to reflect". Gold Coast Bulletin. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "Nine's factual programming slate has had more misses than hits recently with You Saved My Life, which was helmed by McAvoy's wife Tara Brown, axed after two weeks."

    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow You Saved My Life to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

    —Cunard (talk) 07:03, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Cunard: Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:21, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you! Cunard (talk) 09:14, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Cross Border Bridging Finance For Property

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Justservice, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Justservice (talk) 08:03, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Justservice: Not done and will not be done This draft was deleted under G15. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:24, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Patrick Obot

    [edit]

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. the page is Draft:Patrick Obot ~2025-44075-34 (talk) 08:36, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @~2025-44075-34: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:57, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Patrick Obot

    [edit]

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Article name is Patrick Obot. Thank you. ~2025-44075-34 (talk) 08:45, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @~2025-44075-34: Not done As it says at the top: "Do not request that pages or media deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, U7, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11, G12, or G15 be undeleted here." In this case the page was deleted for being promotional (G11). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:54, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Chasing Time (TV series)

    [edit]

    Please restore Chasing Time (TV series), which was deleted as a proposed deletion. Here are sources about Chasing Time:

    1. Lowry, Ben (2002-12-20). "Ulster produced TV show in line for top award". Belfast Telegraph. ProQuest 337129925.

      The article notes: "A global travel series produced by a television company from Northern Ireland has been short-listed for an international award. The programmes, entitled 'Chasing Time In ...', were produced by Holywood-based Brian Waddell Productions for National Geographic Channels, to be screened worldwide. The series will compete for medals in the 45th Annual International Television Programming and Promotion awards run by the New York Festivals, which showcase global TV. The 13 episodes, presented by Trey Farley, involved contestants competing eight challenges in 12 hours in some of the world's great cities, including Rome and Sydney. The successful contestants won a luxury break in the city while the losers were sent home on the next flight."

    2. "Surprise, you're on a reality show". The Straits Times. 2003-02-22. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "Chasing Time, a National Geographic Channel 13-parter, comes hot on the heels of reality show The Amazing Race, which also made a stopover here last year. Singapore is a destination in the second series of Chasing Time, to be aired in October on StarHub Channel 11. In each 30-minute episode, a couple of 20-somethings are whisked off to a foreign city. Armed with a mobile phone, map, phrase book and camera, they must complete eight tasks within 12 hours to win a luxury holiday. A source from National Geographic Channel revealed that filming here was wrapped up in four days. During this time, the contestants learnt calligraphy in Chinatown, convinced people on the street to belt out the national anthem, ate fish head curry and had their fortunes told by a parrot."

    3. Elder, Bruce (2003-01-13). "Pay TV - Saturday". The Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "A simple concept: put two strangers in Sydney and give them a series of tasks to complete in an allotted time. If they succeed they score a holiday. If they fail they go back to Britain. The fun here is, if you're a Sydneysider, realising that what you consider to be easy others will find very difficult. The result is an interesting and fresh view of Sydney."

    4. "Simply Trey-riffic". New Straits Times. 2003-03-07. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "At 27, Trey has waved farewell to the music television industry and now hosts National Geographic Chasing Time, an adventure-travel/challenge show. The clock rules as two contestants are whisked off to a foreign city armed with only a mobile phone, map, phrase book, camera and plenty of chutzpah. The quest: to unravel a bunch of cryptic text messages and explore the city within 12 hours. Success will garner an all-expense paid luxury stay in the chosen city. Otherwise, it's the next plane home. It's different from AXN's Amazing Race. The next Chasing Time instalment was shot in Kuala Lumpur last week."

    5. Hooks, Barbara (2005-07-28). "Monday - Pay TV". The Age. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "One foreign city, two contestants, eight challenges, 12 hours. Succeed and they win five nights of top accommodation; fail and they're flown out tonight in disgrace. As if travel isn't stressful enough, I got a tension headache just watching Pam and Clive shoot around Shanghai in the first of a new series of the global game show. They set such a cracking pace solving the cryptic clues, you see quite a lot of the city. Shanghai is a fast-changing metropolis of 13 million people, few of whom speak English. But they're a friendly lot, keen to help these Londoners find phoenix claws, a Chinese circus and assorted oriental oddities."

    6. James, Caron (2005-10-02). "What's on Foxtel". Herald Sun. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "Actor Kerry Armstrong (below) is the latest actor to front National Geographic Channel's natgeo presents series. This week's premiere episode with Armstrong is Psychic Detectives, looking at how police psychics have become media darlings. The documentary asks if they are really helping police or merely wasting valuable resources and preying on loved-ones' desperation."

    7. "Channel surfing". Sunday Mail. 2005-08-28. Archived from the original on 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2025-12-31.

      The article notes: "Visit the port city where the world's great explorers left on their voyages. Discover the ancient and modern delights of the Portuguese capital - sip espinheira ginjinha, a cherry liqueur; make the city's famed custard tarts; and sample queijadas, sold at fast-food stalls around the bullring."

    8. Hooks, Barbara (2005-10-13). "Pay TV - Monday, October 17". The Age. ProQuest 363865488.

      The article notes: "When Australian expat Bridget Gray and her London flatmate Naomi Hill are presented with 12 cryptic clues and eight hours to solve them, the residents of this colourful and exotic east-west crossroads seem as perplexed as the visitors. Positively Byzantine."

    9. Hooks, Barbara (2005-07-28). "Monday - Pay TV". The Age. ProQuest 363842507.

      The article notes: "One foreign city, two contestants, eight challenges, 12 hours. Succeed and they win five nights of top accommodation; fail and they're flown out tonight in disgrace. As if travel isn't stressful enough, I got a tension headache just watching Pam and Clive shoot around Shanghai in the first of a new series of the global game show. They set such a cracking pace solving the cryptic clues, you see quite a lot of the city. Shanghai is a fast-changing metropolis of 13 million people, few of whom speak English. But they're a friendly lot, keen to help these Londoners find phoenix claws, a Chinese circus and assorted oriental oddities."

    10. Ryan, Andrew (2004-02-28). "Television". The Globe and Mail. ProQuest 383904893.

      The article notes: "A welcome new season of the lively "travel challenge" series starts this week. The clever concept remains the same: Two-person teams are dropped into cities around the world where they take part in complicated scavenger hunt related to various landmarks and the locale they're in. For example, in the first new show, a ditzy Dutch couple arrive in Singapore, and straight away they're required to hunt for pink orchids, after which they try to get some of the shy locals to sing the country's national anthem. It's all in good fun."

    11. "Travel series reaches final". Belfast News Letter. 2002-12-20. ProQuest 324756222.

      The article notes: "Holywood-based independent Brian Waddell Productions Limited has received an early Christmas present. 'Chasing Time In....', a travel series produced for the National Geographic Channels, has achieved finalist status in the 45th Annual International Television Programming and Promotion Awards, run by the New York Festivals."

    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Chasing Time to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

    —Cunard (talk) 09:14, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Freedom Church UK

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm AaronShearer, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it and attempt to get it posted. Thank you. shear.aaron (talk) 09:52, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @AaronShearer: Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:58, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Josep Masana

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:41, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Arthistorian1977: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:45, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Metal energy carriers

    [edit]

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ~2025-44145-91 (talk) 12:41, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Metal_energy_carriers&action=edit&redlink=1

    Inah de Belen

    [edit]

    The page was deleted under G5, can you undelete this page because i want to check the references in that article. —Octaviyanti Dwi Wahyurini (talk) 13:03, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Jimmy Roussounis

    [edit]

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of Draft:Jimmy_Roussounis deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ~2025-43936-55 (talk) 13:52, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @~2025-43936-55: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:32, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Javiera Rodríguez

    [edit]

    The page was deleted under G15 (AI-Generated Content). However, the subject is a deputy-elect, which establishes authomatic notabilty under WP:NPOL. The deletion was procedural rather than based on notabilty. I respectfully request undeletion so the article can be restored to draft space and improved with realiable sources.

    Thanks, :) Carigval.97 (talk) 14:19, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done since this was a G15-deletion. As this is a politician passing WP:NPOL, feel free to start a draft as a stub with "Javiera Rodríguez is a deputy-elect of <LegislatureName>. She was elected in <ElectionName>." Add one proper ref and this would be an acceptable article. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:37, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok! Carigval.97 (talk) 00:00, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm a little concerned about the continued use of AI. You have a history of creating articles with AI and then not resolving the various issues that arise from LLM created articles. You were given several warnings on December 28, along with a warning that this could go to ANI. I would rather see them go back through the articles they've already created and clean up any AI related issues that likely exist with those. I would also recommend that they check in at Wikipedia:WikiProject AI Cleanup to ask for advice on how to ensure that their work doesn't continue to have those issues, if they are going to continue using AI. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:44, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Example

    [edit]

    (This user used the preload form for G13 or U6 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) ~2025-44117-25 (talk) 18:12, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Quimby Ghilotti

    [edit]

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ~2026-5688 (talk) 06:39, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @~2026-5688: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:56, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Ali Al Sayed

    [edit]

    I am requesting undeletion of the article “Ali Al Sayed,” which previously existed and was supported by significant coverage in reliable independent sources including Esquire Middle East, Rolling Stone Middle East, Khaleej Times, Gulf News, and Entrepreneur Middle East.

    The recent deletion followed rapid edits during cleanup and reformatting. The subject clearly meets Wikipedia’s general notability guideline (WP:GNG), and I am requesting restoration of the prior article so it can be improved in line with policy rather than recreated from scratch. —SamerImam (talk) 08:09, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:John Fortie

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:25, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @FloridaArmy: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:07, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Bilindustrien/Sandbox

    [edit]

    This should be undeleted and attached to the right account by being moved to User:Christian Giersing/Sandbox, which should be moved out of the way and deleted as it's just a few redirects that got blanked. I found this because User:Christian Giersing (usurped)/Sandbox is in Category:Candidates for U6 speedy deletion as of 2026-01-01. I checked the relevant move log for more cases like that without finding any, but given the number of user changes this account has had (see the history of their main user page), there might be other deleted pages around. Thanks! Graham87 (talk) 10:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    I've done the moving-out-of-the-way bit and moved the bad sandbox history (just containing redirects and blanking) to User:Christian Giersing/Sandbox/temp, which I've tagged for speedy deletion. Graham87 (talk) 10:33, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
     Done. Christian Giersing has no other deleted user-namespace edits, so there aren't any others. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:58, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Marcus Hsieu-Hong Loo

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm MarcusLoo, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. MarcusLoo (talk) 12:39, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @MarcusLoo: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:04, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Anne Yatco

    [edit]

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of Draft:Anne Yatco, which was deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. WiRalt (talk) 16:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Luca Tomassini

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Flyfiber26, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Flyfiber26 (talk) 17:39, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    10-Hydroxy Lycopodium Alkaloids

    [edit]

    Please restore these redirects as their target page, 10-Hydroxy Lycopodium alkaloids, has been restored after being erroneously deleted. —Steel1943 (talk) 19:14, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Winston Weinberg

    [edit]

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Add topic" button below —WestwoodHights573 (talk) 19:19, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi! I would request the deletion review. My source assessment was claimed to be "false", despite the fact that it is based solely on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources . There were barely two people who voted, and it does not seem that anyone reviewed 20+ sources in the article. The nominator did not address any of the valid questions I asked, or use any policies to support their claim and reasoning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Winston_Weinberg

    The subject meets WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV through sustained, non-trivial coverage in multiple reliable, independent secondary sources with strong editorial oversight. There is no controversial promotional information in the article.

    Interview-based reporting by independent journalists remains independent under WP:SIGCOV and WP:RS when it includes editorial control, narrative framing, and analysis. Independence is determined by authorship and editorial oversight, not by the presence of quotations from the subject.

    Coverage goes beyond routine company news and addresses the person’s background, career, and leadership role in the legal AI sector over time.

    I strongly believe a redirect is inappropriate and inconsistent with Wikipedia practice for notable founders who meet GNG. The sourcing supports a standalone biographical article. I'd appreciate a more detailed review! — Preceding unsigned comment added by WestwoodHights573 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winston Weinberg, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, OwenX (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Steel1943 (talk) 19:30, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Got it! Thank you. I will contact the administrator. I was confused with instructions. WestwoodHights573 (talk) 19:32, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @Steel1943 the administrator told me to "appeal the AfD close at close at WP:DRV." I made a request here already. Is there another template to use? I strongly believe it should be relisted as none of the legitimate points I made were addressed, and nobody discussed anything exempt of me. WestwoodHights573 (talk) 20:17, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @WestwoodHights573: You'll have to go through the instructions listed at WP:DRV to dispute your point. There are instructions there on how to start a new deletion review request/discussion. Either way, this page here is not where deletion discussion disputes are raised. Steel1943 (talk) 20:49, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @Steel1943 Thank you. I made it here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2026_January_1 WestwoodHights573 (talk) 21:30, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Claire Brosseau

    [edit]

    The article was PRODed last year with the concern Insufficient independent in-depth sources to establish notability. That has changed in the past 2 days with a flurry of sources covering her application for assisted suicide. I intend to work on this article when I have time, but I believe that editor attention will also naturally come as the subject becomes more notable. —HKLionel TALK 20:20, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @HKLionel: Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:06, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:John Middleton Smith

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 22:04, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @Arthistorian1977: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:07, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Stephanie M. Tomita

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Haddad Maia fan, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! Haddad Maia fan (talk) 00:11, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @Haddad Maia fan: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:08, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ross Boggess

    [edit]

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. There is more information from recent articles for his political work. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ~2026-24198 (talk) 04:26, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @~2026-24198: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:09, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:INA-Saphir

    [edit]

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ~2026-26544 (talk) 10:12, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Note to admins: This page has been undeleted 3 times in the past. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    It does seem that substantial work was done on the page after the last restoration, but it was thereafter abandoned again. BD2412 T 00:44, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @~2026-26544: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412 T 00:43, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:List of oldest families

    [edit]

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ~2026-27734 (talk) 11:18, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @~2026-27734: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:26, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Gerald R. Butters

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:29, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @FloridaArmy: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:51, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lyceum Magazine

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:29, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @FloridaArmy: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Máire Zepf

    [edit]

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ~2026-34208 (talk) 16:16, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Davis Elen Advertising

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Pixelasticity, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Pixelasticity (talk) 20:45, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @Pixelasticity: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412 T 00:40, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:William M. Rice (architect)

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:56, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @FloridaArmy: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412 T 00:41, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Luis Muñoz Rivera School

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:00, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @FloridaArmy: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412 T 00:41, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Moore House (Mandeville, Louisiana)

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:02, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @FloridaArmy: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412 T 00:41, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Rankin Motel

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:03, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @FloridaArmy: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412 T 00:42, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Mike LeBlanc

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Waves1234, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Waves1234 (talk) 01:29, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Is it about the Chicago Indie-rock group, The Hush Sound member, because your user page may be hinting a different Mike LeBlanc? Jay 💬 06:16, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Theo Somolu

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm OliverWigley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. OliverWigley (talk) 02:29, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @OliverWigley: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:57, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Aníbal Colón Rosado

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 05:25, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @FloridaArmy: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:36, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Rich Yashel

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Beastbrat, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! Beastbrat (talk) 05:55, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @Beastbrat: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:08, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Polypheny

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm V0671, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. V0671 (talk) 10:07, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @V0671: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:36, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Nika Pfeifer

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Stardustwhatever, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. I would like to continue working on this draft and improve it. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Stardustwhatever (talk) 10:21, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @Stardustwhatever: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:47, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Frank Lincoln Mather

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:14, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Nanshan Vinaya

    [edit]

    It was an article about a notable subject matter as it was regarding one of the main Chinese Buddhist traditions that was practiced historically and remains highly prominent in contemporary times as most, if not all, Chinese Buddhist monastics receive ordination under this lineage. —Nyarlathotep1001 (talk) 15:18, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Knights for the body

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm MinorProphet, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. MinorProphet (talk) 15:55, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks for undeleting my draft. It just needs some severe pruning, and then it should be nearly ready for mainspace. Happy New Year. MinorProphet (talk) 11:33, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ruby Trew

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Ranocchio234, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Ranocchio234 (talk) 16:51, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Crow's Theatre

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Sologoud, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. I do intend to finish this page, it has just taken me longer than planned to get to it. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Sologoud (talk) 17:48, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Goldblum & Partners

    [edit]

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ~2026-55100 (talk) 20:47, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Wahab Shittu

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Royalesignature, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Royalesignature (talk). 22:32, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @Royalesignature: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:48, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Many thanks for your prompt response Royalesignature (talk). Royalesignature (talk). 10:22, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Religious society

    [edit]

    Under negotiation with @Gwennie-nyan, Mx. Granger, and I2Overcome: —Anti gozo (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @Anti gozo: Not done -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:50, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bernard Chabbert

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm MoviesandTelevisionFan, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. —MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 22:57, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @MoviesandTelevisionFan: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:49, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Yvette Thuot

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm MoviesandTelevisionFan, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. —MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 23:10, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @MoviesandTelevisionFan: Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:52, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Are You Listening?

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Soulbust, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Soulbust (talk) 03:04, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @Soulbust: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:53, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Wild Spaces

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Soulbust, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Soulbust (talk) 03:05, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @Soulbust: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:53, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Manasichanu

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm DareshMohan, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. I found 3 sources: [1] [2] [3]. DareshMohan (talk) 05:56, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @DareshMohan: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:41, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Krazyandgirlfriend.jpg

    [edit]

    Please undelete deleted revision to move file to Commons. —Michalg95 (talk) 09:28, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Arts Professional

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Rfenwick, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. rfen (talk) 14:59, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @Rfenwick: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:51, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Many thanks rfen (talk) 16:16, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:American Cochlear Implant Alliance

    [edit]

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can work on it, to ensure notability and proper sourcing. Thank you. Kerri9494 (talk) 15:05, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @Kerri9494: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:55, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Shooting room paradox

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm FRuDIxAFLG, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FRuDIxAFLG (talk) 16:19, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Mark Peters

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Banksy817, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Banksy817 (talk) 17:39, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bibhakar Ranjan

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Medauthor, and I would like to request the undeletion of this Draft:Bibhakar Ranjan, which was deleted under G13 (abandoned draft).

    I am actively working on improving the draft, including adding new independent secondary sources (recent national and international media coverage) and addressing previous reviewer feedback regarding tone, sourcing, and notability.

    I would like the draft restored so I can continue improving it prior to resubmission through Articles for Creation.

    Thank you for your time and assistance. Medauthor (talk) 18:11, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Glitch Productions

    [edit]

    The draft is now a page but after someone made an article while the draft still existed, I had to use copy-paste to put the draft article into the main article. At the time I didn't know that you could request a history merge for copy-paste procedure, but I was told at the time such a move was impossible so I didn't pursue it further. The draft was deleted in 2024 but if it's possible, I'd like to bring back the draft for the purpose of merging the history of that article into the current GP article. K-popguardian (talk) 22:27, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @K-popguardian: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412 T 03:45, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Edward_Keith_Hulme

    [edit]

    I contributed this page of a notable Australian to wikipedia and I would like to request that you please restore the page to the draft space so that I can have the opportunity to rewrite it fully myself, and in doing so I will improve the refenrences so that they are all easily verifiable. Thank you for your consideration. —Tamara Slabon (talk) 23:41, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @Tamara Slabon: Draftified – the page has been restored to the draft space at Draft:Samuel Edward Keith Hulme. However, I have move-locked the page to require administrative review before it can be restored to mainspace. BD2412 T 03:47, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:2009 Città di Caltanissetta – Doubles

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm Hiyouboots, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Hiyouboots (talk) 02:50, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    @Hiyouboots: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412 T 03:51, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bonita Meyersfeld

    [edit]

    Hi, I'm LeeAnneGaertner, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 or U6. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. LeeAnneGaertner (talk) 07:48, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=1331234159"