Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template talk:Incomplete sentence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. G8 eligible. Star Mississippi 21:46, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template talk:Incomplete sentence

Does not seem to be useful to wikipedia, and just has a stale "discussion for undeletion" that never was started. Additionally, talk pages are not the correct place to discuss undeletion. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 22:35, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where do I discuss undeletion? Do we need to make a new thing like Wikipedia:Templates for undeletion? - BᴏᴅʜıHᴀᴙᴩ (talk, contributions) 22:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UND ~ oklopfer (💬) 23:00, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Oklopfer Can't WP:UND not be used to undelete pages deleted per a deletion discussion, nor is it the place to discuss undeleting? - BᴏᴅʜıHᴀᴙᴩ (talk, contributions) 01:19, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Deletion review, but this template was correctly deleted, so it probably is best not to bring it back. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 01:21, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:G8. Nardog (talk) 23:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The originator seems to have tagged this template talk page as G8-exempt after the deletion of the template~~, but the originator has not explained what the use of either the (deleted) template or this template talk page is~~. User:BodhiHarp - If you think that Template:Incomplete sentence should not have been deleted, go to Deletion Review, but I think that DRV will Endorse the deletion. Otherwise, please explain what the purpose of this orphaned page is, or say farewell to it. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:59, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This template talk page appears to be a mistaken request to undelete the template. The proper way to request to overturn the close of the template for discussion is DRV, but DRV will probably Endorse the TFD. An editor can request that a deleted page be undeleted at Requests for Undeletion, but I see no reason why such a request would be granted. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:16, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - MFD is a content forum, but I have advised User:BodhiHarp to ask for advice at the Teahouse about editing constructively, so that they can avoid being blocked as a good-faith timesink. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:16, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete irrelevant noise. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:33, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.