Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zooppa (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zooppa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Except the promoting like some brochure and working with big brands and tagging them in the encyclopedia nothing makes it closer to notable or significant. Previously Deleted with all votes and here it is written again. Light2021 (talk) 16:17, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:PROMO, with copy such as "...global social network for creative talent that partners with brands and agencies to launch user-generated advertising projects. " And it goes downhill from there. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:52, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 11:02, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.