Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachary Adam Chesser
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. At the current stage, I don't see that there is a consensus to delete. However as time goes on, it may become more obvious that this is covered by WP:NOTNEWS. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Zachary Adam Chesser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Routine coverage of a person who is notable for making some terrorist threats. WP:NOTNEWS. There is no long-standing notability here, just basic coverage on events. Beerest355 Talk 23:03, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable per substantial coverage in reliable sources and involvement in several significant episodes including the threats to South Park. Covered over quite some time in various media sources and books as an American terrorist. Candleabracadabra (talk) 21:01, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A Google search on the subject shows it is still covered by widely varying sources, including senate.gov. Thundermaker (talk) 12:57, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.