Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yan Perchuk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:02, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yan Perchuk

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

UPE Promotion for Non notable musician. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Lists lots of "works" but does not say what he done for each. Look at the large list of film and tv work. Compare with the very small amount listed in the sources. Article is bombarded with multiple sources but none are independent reliable sources with any depth of coverage of him. Passing mentions,Wikipedia mirror, primary, shop, event listings and other crappy sources. Pure PR complete with official promo shot. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:37, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:38, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Obviously a paid article. Nothing more than a CV. All her articles should just be deleted regardless of merit. - hahnch e n 13:08, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Hahnchen: On that note, Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 142#Amandadoyle543. --Izno (talk) 17:10, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.