Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where's Everybody

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where's Everybody

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, unnotable. _Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 10:19, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:42, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:42, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malta-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:42, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's no evidence of notability. FalconK (talk) 00:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've added sources, now meets WP:GNG. I'm concerned that it appears the nominator has not conducted a WP:BEFORE search in this and other AfDs. NemesisAT (talk) 16:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The topic is an organization therefore GNG is not the appropriate guideline, its NCORP for companies/organizations. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:00, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria, even the ones added by NemesisAT which were more-of-the-same "advertorials with no accredited journalist" articles. I have been unable to find any references that meet NCORP criteria, topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.