Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TV3 News @ 6

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The clear consensus is keep after two reslists - discussions about the possibility of merging can be taken up on the articles talk page (non-admin closure) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 04:02, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TV3 News @ 6

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable former news program Natg 19 (talk) 00:12, 30 August 2014 (UTC).[reply]

I am also nominating thes related pages because they are also non-notable former news programs from the same TV network. Like TV3 News @ 6, they only have 1 reference:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 05:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (confess) @ 20:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing improvements are certainly needed, but a nationally distributed news program on a national network in a sovereign country passes WP:NMEDIA right on its face. Flag for reference improvements but keep — or, alternatively, merge the articles into a longer and probably more easily referenceable omnibus article about the network's news division. Bearcat (talk) 06:11, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. By the program's nature, as @Bearcat says, it meets notability because it was the main news flagship for a national TV channel. The fact that it is a poor article is grounds to add it to articles that need improving, not for deletion. Fiachra10003 (talk) 00:14, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.