Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sign language interpreters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. This is a clear-cut case of copyright infringement from multiple sources. See [1], [2], [3]. Deleted under WP:CSD#G12 with no prejudice against making this a redirect to sign language or recreating as a sourced, non-copyright violation article on the profession of the sign language interpreter. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:26, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sign language interpreters

Mostly overlaps American Sign Language and Deaf culture. A lot of unsourced POV. No citations. Poorly written. PROD was deleted by an anon less than 24 hours after posting, but no changes were made. No changes made in over two weeks since PROD was deleted. Creator of article was notified of PROD, but did not respond. Ward3001 (talk) 23:18, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —Ward3001 (talk) 23:18, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if not completely rewritten. The current version not only has the above-mentioned problems, it smells like a copyvio. However, there is in principle no reason we couldn't have an article on the profession of sign language interpreter. Just not this one. —An gr 05:16, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Sign language. That page is much more comprehensive and neutral. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.