Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shujitsu University

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Mhawk10 (talk) 05:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shujitsu University

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL. ThatIPEditor - Public (talk) 19:44, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ThatIPEditor - Public (talk) 19:44, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Fails NSCHOOL as it is right now, but there is a lot more info on the Japanese Wikipedia article on the school. It is still a stub over there too, but I feel like work could be done on this to salvage it. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 20:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The Japanese Wikipedia article is awful (sasuga, jawiki). Nothing in it suggests notability. Mlb96 (talk) 06:14, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Yahoo! News refers to seven Okayama universities including Okayama University of Science and Shujitsu University (岡山理科大学や就実大学など市内7つの大学). Given this, I'm willing to err on the side of notability. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 14:20, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Most of the references in the Japanese article are primary. Except for two. Neither of which looks super great. My guess is that if there was usable sources out there that they would already be in the Japanese article. That said, I'm airing on the weak side because who really knows. Maybe there are some. I don't speak Japanese and don't want to presume to know, but we still have to work with what we do or don't have meantime. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.