Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shredderman Rules

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 02:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shredderman Rules

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Found no additional coverage and what's on page isn't sufficient for GNG or NFO. QuietHere (talk) 23:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. QuietHere (talk) 23:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All the actors are bluelinked, it was aired on Nickelodeon, and just because something isn't successful doesn't mean it isn't notable. The-J-Verse (talk) 17:40, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It has two sources to pass WP:GNG and all blue-linked actors, and was carried by a major children's network. Not everything is going to be High School Musical, and we don't expect all of our articles to be that either. Nate • (chatter) 02:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Besides the New York Times review already in the article, there are reviews in DVD Talk, The Hollywood Reporter, Common Sense Media and Dove.org. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 05:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep,The article is ok and passws WP:GNG. Alex-h (talk) 13:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the multiple reliable sources reviews identified in this discussion that show a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There is WP:SIGCOV by WP:RS to establish WP:NOTABILITY. Article has WP:POTENTIAL. Shawn Teller (talk) 19:52, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.