Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samia Shahid

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Samia Shahid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sourced, but thisis a WP:1E. A routine murder. WP:NOTNEWS. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:09, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep 'honour killing' in Pakistan is a social issue. After the death of Qandeel Baloch it is a second high profile murder in Pakistan. Such killings has compelled the Pakistani government to make a law against honour killings.[1] Wide Media coverage of Samia killing not only in Pakistan but across the borders proves that it was not A ROUTINE MURDER.Sneha Hurrain (talk) 08:04, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:58, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:59, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:59, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:01, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete Fails https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_newspaper KalamCStone (talk) 12:20, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Blocked sock—UY Scuti Talk 19:24, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:24, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 21:01, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.