Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Run for Love
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 02:19, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Run for Love (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Film does not appear to have attracted sufficient general interest (has not even come out yet) for a standalone article. KDS4444Talk 17:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- "Has not come out" doesn't mean a film can't have a page if it has already finished filming, Wikipedia even allows a film like Journey to the West (2016 film) which is just a hoax (hasn't even started filming or named any director) to stay after multiple deletion requests. Timmyshin (talk) 17:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NFF, principal photography has begun, I have added sources to verify that, and the production itself is notable. Sam Sailor Talk! 17:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 01:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 01:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per truly diligent WP:BEFORE showing that filming has commenced and its production is notable through our basic inclusion criteria. It really was easy enough to to see that the project meets WP:NFF (paragraph 3). Schmidt, Michael Q. 21:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.