Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod Yancy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:37, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rod Yancy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, is WP:ADMASQ. WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT. Just a WP:ROTM lawyer and some sort of entrepreneur. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 16:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Oklahoma. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 16:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, all sources are either primary, or interviews - no independent 3rd party coverage. monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 18:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak redirect to The Oath Studio, where his name is mentioned. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 01:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like mostly primary and trivial coverage. I did search for anything more on Google but there isn't much there. Clembedorio (talk) 02:35, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on present evidence. — Very Polite Person (talk/contribs) 16:33, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.