Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymann Rayy
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:37, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Raymann Rayy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Vanity page sourced by own website/YouTube and unreliable sources. Even though I've pushed it back to draft multiple times, the creator has insisted on pushing it into mainspace. I don't see where he is meeting WP:MUSICBIO at all or WP:ENT. The one Times of India article doesn't even mention his name. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:18, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:19, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:19, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:20, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: fails WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO and WP:CREATIVE. Could this be speedily deleted under WP:G11? Richard3120 (talk) 18:34, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Most of the sources in the article are merely links to works made by the subject. All the rest which are possible reliable sources only mention the name in passing. Unless independent, reliable sources can be shown that discuss this subject extensively, there's nothing to use to write an article with. --Jayron32 19:18, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Not to mention WP:COI concerns arising to the fact that the article's pic was uploaded by a person with a similar name. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 21:16, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing notable, and uses the word "famous" twice. David notMD (talk) 23:08, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks multiple, reliable sources, which appears to be about a non notable subject. THEFlint Shrubwood (talk) 00:14, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.