Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Turney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against restoring to draftspace if desired per WP:REFUND. czar 02:06, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Turney

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP is sourced to a single book. WP:BEFORE on Google News, Google Books, JSTOR, and newspapers.com fails to unearth additional, non-fiction references. Fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV. Chetsford (talk) 18:08, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise move to draft space. BOZ (talk) 18:13, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:28, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - that has to be one of strangest Career sections I have ever read - but that's not the reason for deletion - does not meet WP:BASIC; has not been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources - Epinoia (talk) 01:16, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Amakuru (talk) 20:57, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - badly fails WP:GNG. It's unclear whether this person is a hobbyist or professional. There's too little to go on. Bearian (talk) 20:59, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - so many things are wrong with this article; the career section that barely makes any sense, the structure, lack of sources. The article clearly fails WP:GNG. I couldn't locate any more solid references. — Kstone999 (talk) 13:45, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.