Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ROLZE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Sorry I didn't notice this speedy sooner. Y'all can always ping me on my talk page regarding speedy d's. Missvain (talk) 21:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ROLZE

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline A7 eligible article for a non notable rapper who a before search shows lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Furthermore subject doesn’t satisfy any criterion from WP:MUSICBIO. Celestina007 (talk) 12:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete a 12-year old with just a insta ref for a future first release - should have just been speedied. KylieTastic (talk) 13:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@KylieTastic, Good point! But from my experience, I figured the article creator would be the type to create and re-create the article no matter what, hence I thought it wise to follow the AFD process so in future a G4 would come in handy. Celestina007 (talk) 14:31, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete under A7 and G11. Foxnpichu (talk) 15:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per everyone above. No evidence of notability. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 16:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete under A7, maybe even G11. There are 0 sources about the subject. I checked his Instagram page to see if he was famous or something, but even I have more followers. There might be a COI going on here. No proof of passing WP:GNG, WP:BASIC or WP:ARTIST. The article has been rejected in Articles for Creation here, but still created, suggesting that the article could've been recreated after a speedy deletion, so an AfD seems like the right choice. ~Styyx ^{Talk? ^-^} 17:52, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of things in this article are also on draftspace: Draft:PABLO and Draft:Deadeyes. These are clearly also not notable. ~Styyx ^{Talk? ^-^} 18:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete under A7 and possibly G11 (as per above). Pahunkat (talk) 18:05, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Can somebody please close this AfD? I don’t mean to be impatient, but I think we have far more than enough reasons and consensus for a Speedy Delete. Foxnpichu (talk) 23:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.