Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuillBot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Course Hero. Star Mississippi 03:14, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

QuillBot

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks significant independent coverage from reliable sources, making it difficult to establish its notability per Wikipedia's guidelines. LusikSnusik (talk) 15:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. LusikSnusik (talk) 15:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Software. Skynxnex (talk) 16:43, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to Course Hero, its current parent company and what it's now been blended into. Nathannah • 📮 18:19, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Course Hero as per Nathannah NikolaiVektovich (talk) 12:57, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There are a lot of GScholar papers about QuillBot. For whatever reason a lot of them are Indonesian journals. Are there good/reliable ones in there, or should all of them be dismissed? Helpful Raccoon (talk) 03:03, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge : It should be merged to its parenr company ie Course Hero. Currently lacks enough sources. Gauravs 51 (talk) 05:29, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.