Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nik Halik

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 03:20, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nik Halik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable- nothing about him online besides his books. TheAwesomeHwyh 21:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. TheAwesomeHwyh 21:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:27, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom - if he does do a spaceflight article can be recreated but nothing apparent to establish notability. On basis of articles obtained by User:Northamerica1000 this is probably borderline, so I'll change to neutral as the article needs significant work and sourcing. Bookscale (talk) 11:16, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 01:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – Per a basic WP:BEFORE search, I found some articles and content about the subject in seconds, listed below. Not !voting at this time, but the subject has received some coverage outside of the purview of his books. Furthermore, coverage about a subject's books can qualify notability per WP:AUTHOR if independent book reviews in RS are available. North America1000 02:03, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui  07:55, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep While much of the article and in fact the searches turn up puff pieces I am convinced there is notoriety in the subject: Perhaps not for the book (5 Day Weekend) which was a co-write situation, but more for the subject's wealth and ability to perhaps be a civilian moonwalker. I found references which appear in reliable sources: Forbes, Times of India, Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and Entrepreneur The article is in need of a Neutral POV rewrite (I started to add refs and rewrite a bit), however WP:NOTCLEANUP Seems this subject meets our general notability guidelines. Lightburst (talk) 20:42, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 22:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.