Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naseem Vicky (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ‑Scottywong | babble _ 15:02, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Naseem Vicky

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was tempting to suggest CSD G4 here, but there are some differences in the article. What there's not, since the previous AfD discussion 8 months ago, is new sources that get to the crux of evidencing notability, at least ones I can find. Additional sources welcomed, as always, note that the first (not the second) AfD pinned its hopes on putative Urdu sources, which may still be in existence. joe decker ^{talk to me} 03:45, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I looked at the urdu sources and I'd say that he is notable. He has WP:RSs they are just in urdu. Someone needs to work on this article, maybe someone from Wikipedia:Pakistan can help us out with this. The Determinator p t c 16:31, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can you point me at some of those? Perhaps if I can take a look, I'd be open to withdrawing the nom. --joe decker ^{talk to me} 16:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After a careful review of what appeared to be WP:RSs are just blogs, forums and listings of him as a actor in different shows. Although I still think it's a weak keep. Here's the idea that I got from looking for WP:RS he has taken part in a lot of stage shows, so he has a big enough following. So, according to Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Entertainers he is notable and therefore a keep. I still see your point with verifiability. The Determinator p t c 15:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Subject is a notable artist per WP:ENTERTAINER ([1], [2], [3]). --SMS ^Talk 20:09, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per sources given by SMS. That is good enough verification for notability. Mar4d (talk) 02:12, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.