Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naseem Vicky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Needs expansion and better sources. Tone 22:40, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Naseem Vicky

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO and WP:ENT . 1 mention in gnews [1]. created by an editor who was only on WP for 1 day. Unless someone can find something in Urdu... LibStar (talk) 07:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - Seems to be notable in Pakisten. Unless Pakistani contributors provide reliable, verifiable and independent sources, this page is candidate to be deleted Rirunmot (talk) 00:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —LibStar (talk) 08:12, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:24, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:35, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Received an award (or maybe an "award" from NME for a goofy video [2]; seems to be enough out there to infer notability from, despite lack of English-language sources. Article badly needs attention from editor familiar with general subject. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:54, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I don't read Urdu, all I can do is just pick out the Persian or Arabic words in Urdu text. But I see his name in lots of newspaper headlines on regular Google search and he seems to have some sort of involvement in theatre: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. cab (talk) 11:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.