Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Weicker (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Weicker

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film director. Accepted by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheWikiholic. US-Verified (talk) 18:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is the second nomination and it runs the risk of being as unaffected as the first, due to a lack of participation. Well, as far as I understand the situation, his brother is notable and he is not. The German WP page about him has been removed. Suitskvarts (talk) 07:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete: This is not notable, and this is the second nomination. CastJared (talk) 08:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing found for this individual, there seems to be lots of coverage in the sportosworld world for a person with a similar name, nothing about a film person. Gsearch in .de sites goes straight to his personal website, then various promo sites, then peters off... The awards section lists more than a dozen; if the person was this this renown, I'd expect to find coverage of them all over the place; there just isn't any. Oaktree b (talk) 13:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Rights holder" appears to mean "owns the copyright", which isn't terribly notable, you can assign it to anyone with the right legal setup. Oaktree b (talk) 13:46, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.