Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manthan Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Manthan Systems

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the notability requirement; NCORP. Most sources are simple remarks or news about investing, raising funds, acquisition news etc. RPSkokie (talk) 16:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. RPSkokie (talk) 16:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: See also the parallel discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algonomy, the firm's current name. AllyD (talk) 17:22, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Both articles have a lot of press, but I do not see anything meeting WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Week delete I can see the subject has coverage in multiple business and finance news sources, but the independence and reliability of the references are still questionable per WP:ORGCRIT. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 20:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I could have potentially closed as delete, but I relisted the other debate so figured it would be logical to relist this one also. Daniel (talk) 20:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm unable to find reliable, substantive, intellectually independent coverage. Vanamonde (Talk) 22:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.