Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algonomy
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Algonomy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet the notability requirement; NCORP. RPSkokie (talk) 16:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United States of America. RPSkokie (talk) 16:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: See also the parallel discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manthan Systems, one of the preceding constituent firms. AllyD (talk) 17:22, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Both articles have a lot of press, but I do not see anything meeting WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 19:59, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I'm unable to find reliable, substantive, intellectually independent coverage. Vanamonde (Talk) 22:33, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.