Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labov marketing communications and training

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Goldsztajn (talk) 11:24, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Labov marketing communications and training

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Labov marketing communications and training (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability (NCORP), mainly unsourced page with promotional content. Cinder painter (talk) 08:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies, and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Delete: Very little content is referenced, and of the three references, one is directly tied to the subject and other is a local chamber of commerce (whose main task is to promote local businesses). So there's one article that's independent and reliable, which maybe (or maybe not) establishes notability. I've tagged the article as needing more references, but I don't think the company meets notability criteria. Ira Leviton (talk) 14:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Delete: WP:NOTPROMO - This looks to be an unfinished recruitment advertisement. Of the three sources, one is a book written by this company's founder. The key people are all red links. — Maile (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.