Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LJ Create

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:49, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LJ Create

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable company; very little coverage - nothing that can be considered significant; page created and almost all content added by an employee Rayman60 (talk) 18:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 18:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 18:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 17:37, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 17:37, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was originally going to vote draftify, but I see that the author hasn't been active for a year. I think the article has potential, but for now I vote for deletion. There are no sources that are outside the location of the company, thus failing WP:GNG. INeedSupport ^:3 17:31, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.