Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaavya Sha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Loudspeaker (2018 film). Star Mississippi 03:54, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kaavya Sha

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From a WP:BEFORE, I am unable to find any independent sources with significant coverage. The only sources I could find with SIGCOV are interviews /wedding announcements, which are ineligible towards GNG. NACTOR is also not met here, as none of these roles are significant enough to warrant a separate article. No plausible ATDR either. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:41, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, India, and Maharashtra. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:41, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per references from The New Indian Express, The News Minute, The Times of India [1], [2] and her work in many notable movies as mentioned in the article. Behappyyar (talk) 20:25, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've added more references to it. And Despite this, it is incomprehensible to tag for AfD after a senior editor has already reviewed it. Behappyyar (talk) 06:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: There certainly seems to be more than just passing coverage in the Times of India sources.--Ipigott (talk) 08:15, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep According to WP:GNG, significant coverage from reliable for establishing the notability of a topic. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 08:30, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Ipigott and S-Aura, would you mind mentioning the WP:THREE best sources or the sources you think help the subject pass GNG or NACTOR? It would be great to see a source analysis, as all I could find is routine coverage and nothing independent of the subject. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:46, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Loudspeaker (2018 film). Clearly the only named member of the cast and her only lead role [3]. DareshMohan (talk) 04:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: To Loudspeaker (2018 film), the better option. Claims notability in someway but lacks sufficient reliable sources to fully support this claim.--— MimsMENTOR ^talk 08:10, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:SIGCOV easily. Here are a few more mentions [4], [5], [6] Tau Corvi (talk) 20:38, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Tau Corvi, Indiaglitz is unreliable and the other two sources are not independent. There seems to be no coverage of the Paisa movie mentioned in the TOI source or about its director. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 21:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Jeraxmoira🐉, please explain why Indiatimes is not independent, I don't get it Tau Corvi (talk) 15:36, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Those are interviews and interviews are primary sources. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:10, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't say that this can be classified as an interview [7]. And this is even more so [8]. Anyway, you call these sources not independent, and I still don't understand why. In my opinion, the links I provided demonstrate how a major Indian media covers the life of an actress (her wedding and debut in cinema) Tau Corvi (talk) 17:21, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What makes you think they are independent sources? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:03, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any indication that IndiaTimes is affiliated with Kaavya Sha. If there is, please point it out. Tau Corvi (talk) 20:16, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So by your understanding, IndiaTimes is not independent only if it is affiliated with Kaavya Sha? Please read and understand WP:PRIMARY, WP:SECONDARY, WP:INTERVIEWS and Indiscriminate sources before dropping your two cents in an AfD discussion. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:44, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, very informative. I just don't think that, for example, the announcement of a film with Sha, in which her commentary is given, can be considered an interview. In my understanding, this is first and foremost an article about her debut in cinema. Tau Corvi (talk) 22:06, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 02:39, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:

Source assessment table
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Kavya Shah to Tamil, item number to good roles	No byline		~	✘ No
Actress Kaavya Sha talks about being grateful	Interview	~		✘ No
Kaavya Sha debuts in Bala’s Thaarai Thappattai		Independent blog	~	✘ No
Mr & Mrs Ramachari Actress Kaavya Sha Bagged Her Next Flick	Press release			✘ No
Kaavya Sha gets married to producer Varun Gowda		~	Video coverage of her marriage	✘ No
Mr & Mrs Ramachari actress back in action	Press release	~		✘ No
'Loudspeaker' review: A cheesy, forgettable film			Passing mention - Review	✘ No
Kaavya Sha signs her next in Sandalwood		~	Routine coverage	✘ No
Kaavya Sha turns television reporter		~	Routine coverage	✘ No
Rachita, Bhavana To Shake A Leg With Sudeep In ‘Mukunda Murari’			Passing mention	✘ No
'Loudspeaker' movie review: ‘Simple’ game leads to complicated situation			Passing mention - Review	✘ No
Mookajjiya Kanasugalu Movie Review : Jnanapith Award-winning novel comes alive onscreen		~	Passing mention - Review	✘ No
Kaavya Sha shoots with Santhanam for the Tamil film Paris Jayaraj	~ Interview	~		~ Partial
In memory of Puneeth, guests at Kaavya Sha’s wedding will be able to donate their organs	Interview	~		✘ No
Kaavya Sha to debut with Paisa	~ Partial Interview	~		~ Partial
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Per WP:GNG, even if we consider multiple publications from TOI group as a single source for the purpose of establishing notability, we would still require two more good sources. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC) Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Loudspeaker (2018 film): Source analysis by Jeraxmoira provides a clear and insightful overview. Charlie (talk) 07:58, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any more support for redirect as ATD?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 06:47, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Loudspeaker (2018 film). RangersRus (talk) 00:58, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Loudspeaker (2018 film). After discounting WP:NEWSORGINDIA not much is left. Gheus (talk) 00:12, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Loudspeaker (2018 film). Taking NEWSORGINDIA into consideration, I only find two sources that are reliable and the one is more of a tabloid offering while the other is a mention of a role. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:38, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.