Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justinmind (software)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Justinmind (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fluffy product description for an app lacking WP:SIGCOV. Sources that aren't the app's website are limited to lists of apps that won an award. Only one of these lists discusses the app, and it's more ad copy Wizmut (talk) 17:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Being limited to lists does not mean the source doesn't count towards significant coverage. [1] is definitely not just ad copy, and, apparently, the fucking EU wrote an article about their tools to design for spatial computing. (Not that it's your fault for not realizing that article exists. I glanced over it on first sight because the title under Google search results is just too darn long and windy and untoward.) There's also some buzz about some "Absolute Report" about them that's locked behind business bureaucracy. Aaron Liu (talk) 03:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.