Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesuit University System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Uncontested sources. Consensus is that the subject passes WP:LISTN. (non-admin closure) wumbolo ^^^ 11:01, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jesuit University System

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 09:46, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Fails GNG because there aren't any independent in-depth sources. Could iut be any simpler than that?96.127.244.27 (talk) 10:03, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:37, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, added to previous Comment: This Uniradio News report is independent, if not in depth.

This is written by "Elio Masferrer Kan, an expert on religion issues", and carried in the San Diego Union Tribune.

This is a media report on the current work of the organization on behalf of refugees.

This is the system's posting on its XXV Sports Meeting, repeated here. Jzsj (talk) 13:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Why would this chart of a sports meeting, without any descriptive text, be considered a reliable source? Do you think that anything with the title of the organisaiton in it is a reliable source? Please read WP:RS. Again. 96.127.244.27 (talk) 17:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but needs refs There are some big and well-known institutions here, and frankly I find it very hard to believe there aren't enough sources, presumably mostly in in Spanish. I suspect over-precise search terms are being used. This does not link to the es:wp Sistema Universitario Jesuita, though that is a reference-free zone. Oh, guess what? There's a whole frigging book, in English: google, Jesuit Student Groups, the Universidad Iberoamericana, and Political Resistance in Mexico, 1913-1979, Author David Espinosa, Publisher UNM Press, 2014, ISBN 0826354610, 9780826354617. Abysmal WP:BEFORE! Johnbod (talk) 02:01, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Interesting, but as far as the preview of this book goes, it never mentions the organisation we are discussing here... The Banner talk 01:19, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What "organization"? The article describes it as a "network", presumably of institutions that are each their own organization, and it would probably be better renamed to Jesuit universities in Mexico, which is a far more productive search term. Johnbod (talk) 01:58, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: most entries have articles; would qualify under WP:LISTN. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- It is certainly an inadequate article, needing improvement, but that is not a ground for deletion. The article should be appropriately tagged. WP:V is verifiable, not verified. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:25, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as agree that it passes WP:LISTN, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:22, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.