Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Shum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 10:35, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Jared Shum

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Jared Shum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sign showing this activist's notability to warranty a Wikipedia article. Sources are equally not reliable. First is an instagram source coupled with links a firm profile. I will leave it here for the community to gauge his notability 10MB (talk) 10:20, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

• Delete IMDb and Instagram are not reliable sources, does not satisfy WP:GNG for my mind. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:44, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

• Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources. Nothing in the article itself or in google searches indicates that it gets close to meeting WP:GNG. noq (talk) 11:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:34, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Source from CNN added for more verification. What other sources would you need to keep this page from being deleted? LSJU94305 (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2019 (UTC)LSJU94305

• Delete Per Noq and being interviewed in one episode of an insignificant CNN documentary series does not qualify for notability. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 17:50, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. --SalmanZ (talk) 22:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

• Rebuttal - USoA is an Emmy Award winning television show entering its fifth season. Genuinely curious, how does that make it an insignificant series? If sources are currently not acceptable, how can you change a page back into a draft so it doesn't get completely deleted? I've been writing about notable members from the community and would like to continue to add to articles as more arise. LSJU94305 (talk) 03:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC) LSJU94305

• Comment In his case, remove the sources such as IMDb and Instagram. CNN documentary series may pass as a credible source tough.—Allenjambalaya (talk) 12:03, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
• Delete guests interviewed on episodes of a TV show, no matter how notable, do not become notable. Nor do people mentioned as sources for a postion in one article in a newspaper.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:13, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.