Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot B
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:53, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hot B (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search and no one at WT:VG had anything. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Please {{ping}} me if you find something noteworthy. czar 05:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 05:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. czar 05:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as searches are finding nothing particularly better. SwisterTwister talk 21:58, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - this company did produce a number of notable game titles in the 1983-1993 period. The article lacks significant RS sources, but maybe it could be restructured as a list article instead, something like 'list of hotb games'. Since the company dissolved in the mid-1990s, there is no chance the article is promotional, so this one should be given a bit more consideration than the many spammy stubs for recent/current software developers.Dialectric (talk) 15:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- The problem is that the Hot B games don't have enough sources for their own articles either. czar 02:49, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 17:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 17:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Although I believe there is relevancy here, as no reliable sources can be found about, it should be deleted, its a pity though. Masterofroks (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.