Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homa Quazilbash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:35, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Homa Quazilbash

Obviously I feel the article should be up. She's notable in Oregon and I feel it worthy of a wiki entry. Time since graduation from college is technically an irrelevant detail and the sources used are clear - they're from KTVZ! User:AAMKhanMD —Preceding undated comment added 03:55, 28 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A news producer for the 5pm newscast at a TV news station in Bend, Oregon. Just graduated college and has only been a producer for 21 months. Article says she is a newscaster, but unable find references to where she is or not. There are videos of news stories on Google with her name attached, but never show her. This is a case of WP:TOOSOON. Prod was contested Bgwhite (talk) 07:43, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG due to complete lack of independence in references. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:25, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Seems appropriate for Wikipedia, given popularity in Oregon and featured newscasts. Questions regarding "where she is or not" [sic] are precisely why a Wikipedia article helps. -Jzee789 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jzee789 (talk • contribs) 02:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter (state the obvious (or not)) 20:18, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable, first 20 Google hits are social networking or station promotional information. —EncMstr (talk) 02:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: (Google search results for context)
It says at WP:BASIC, "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." The article at its current state doesn't satisfy that, neither do the search results. Jsayre64 (talk) 00:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.