Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoFLUENT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GoFLUENT

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A previous draft was rejected at AfC and subsequently deleted. This instance, also by the WP:SPA connected contributor, has been moved into mainspace so it seems appropriate to seek a consensus about whether the company is notable. Aside from routine listings, the article is referenced by a product award from Human Resource Executive in 2020 and announcement coverage of a deal to provide Amazon (company) training. Searches find occasional announcement-based coverage of financials transactions and partnership deals, but these again are trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH, just indicating a company going about its business; I am not seeing the in-depth coverage needed to demonstrate notability here. AllyD (talk) 20:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Education, Software, and Switzerland. AllyD (talk) 20:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete PR press releases and brief company profiles are a long way from GNG for here; it's great that they provide software to Amazon, but that's what software companies do; I'm sure they aren't the only ones that deal with Amazon, so that's not notable. Winning an HR award from an HR magazine is not more notable. The fact that this was already rejected after AfC should tell them it's not notable. Oaktree b (talk) 21:09, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete strongly in favor of deleting this article, as it lacks significant coverage and thus fails WP:COMPANY Ppt91 (talk) 23:04, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Aside from the press releases, the sources present in the article and that i could find online are precisely the type of sources that are trivial coverage of the subject. - Aoidh (talk) 00:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage. Fails WP:COMPANY.--იაკობ მახარაძე (talk) 18:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per non etc --Devoke water 11:22, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the sources meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:32, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.