Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fountain to a Rose
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Darcelle XV Plaza. Liz Read! Talk! 19:48, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fountain to a Rose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No coverage in RS other than entries on the Portland city website and a local blog. WP:RUNOFTHEMILL PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 20:04, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Oregon. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 20:04, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete my best WP:BEFORE search only brought up Wikipedia mirror sites, one primary archival record in a database, a blog, and then "no more results." SportingFlyer T·C 22:52, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect to Darcelle XV Plaza. If there's not enough content and sourcing for a standalone article, then at least copy over the text to the entry for the park. Also, the redirect would serve a purpose by sending readers to the appropriate article and preserving the page's edit history. ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:16, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Merge content to Darcelle XV Plaza. Fountains have no inherent notability, and this former fountain fails both WP:GNG and WP:GEOFEAT criteria. Sourcing consists of a city press release about the plaza's temporary closure. Netherzone (talk) 05:01, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Visual arts. Netherzone (talk) 05:02, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete/merge Even if there were actual sources, the article on the plaza/square should cover features of the plaza/square without the need for separate articles. Reywas92Talk 21:59, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.