Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Intuition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First Intuition

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is promotional and only relies on non-independent sources. Other sources on the net such as this and this are also self-published. Request delete per WP:ORGCRITE. AbsoluteWissen (talk) 04:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. AbsoluteWissen (talk) 04:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Has been tagged for multiple issues for years without improvement. Little more than an advertisement. Completely fails WP:ORGCRIT. Created by an editor with virtually no other edits. AusLondonder (talk) 16:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.