Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Femigon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Will create redirects to the appropriate series. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:58, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Femigon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not establish notability independent of Ultraman through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 17:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. These characters are non-notable and appear only in a very limited number of episodes. Having articles for every one-shot/three-shot antagonist does nothing to enhance encyclopedic knowledge of this series. This obsessive, in-universe catalog of minor characters belongs on Wikia. WP:ATD allows for the deletion of non-notable, unencyclopedic articles, and these are both. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete per NinjaRobotPirate, no significant coverage from independent secondary sources, fails WP:GNG.Folken de Fanel (talk) 20:35, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Miniapolis 00:20, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.